<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UIUC GEO &#187; Search Results  &#187;  GEO and International Student Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uigeo.org/?s=GEO%20and%20International%20Student%20Rights&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uigeo.org</link>
	<description>Graduate Employees&#039; Organization at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:10:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Open letter to UIUC faculty regarding international students and the strike</title>
		<link>http://www.uigeo.org/2009/11/16/open-letter-to-uiuc-faculty-regarding-international-students-and-the-strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uigeo.org/2009/11/16/open-letter-to-uiuc-faculty-regarding-international-students-and-the-strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>odellcampbell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UIUC coalitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bargaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uigeo.org/?p=649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear UIUC Faculty,</p>











Greetings from GEO! We are writing to you today to ensure that you are
aware of the rights of international students and employees to
participate in activities related to collective bargaining.  Most
especially, we want to emphasize to you that international graduate
students who are members of GEO and are employed in the GEO bargaining
unit have the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 16px;">Dear UIUC Faculty,</span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">Greetings from GEO! We are writing to you today to ensure that you are<br />
aware of the rights of international students and employees to<br />
participate in activities related to collective bargaining.  Most<br />
especially, we want to emphasize to you that international graduate<br />
students who are members of GEO and are employed in the GEO bargaining<br />
unit have the full legal right to participate in GEO&#8217;s strike against<br />
the University of Illinois.</p>
<p>As University Spokesperson Robin Kaler has made clear in numerous<br />
public statements, the legality of the GEO strike is not in question.<br />
Under the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Act (IELRA), GEO<br />
members who are employed in the GEO bargaining unit therefore have a<br />
clear right to strike.  In this matter, citizenship status is<br />
irrelevant, as every person in the United States has the right to join<br />
and participate in a union under the First Amendment&#8217;s guarantee of<br />
freedom of association.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the IELRA in Section 14(a)(1)-14(a)(3) specifically<br />
prohibits the University of Illinois or its agents from engaging in<br />
any action which would tend to interfere, coerce, or restrain<br />
employees in their exercise of their legitimate collective bargaining<br />
rights.  Therefore, were you to discourage an international graduate<br />
student from participating in the GEO strike, you could be in<br />
violation of the law and subject to an Unfair Labor Practice charge.</p>
<p>We hope that you support GEO in our struggle to guarantee that<br />
graduate employees will not lose their tuition waivers.  However,<br />
regardless of your position on that issue, we expect and insist that<br />
you refrain from any activity or communication which might have the<br />
effect of intimidating or otherwise interfering with international<br />
graduate employees who wish to exercise their right to participate in<br />
collective bargaining.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>The Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization</p></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uigeo.org/2009/11/16/open-letter-to-uiuc-faculty-regarding-international-students-and-the-strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GEO speaks out against Daily Illini editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.uigeo.org/2009/10/18/geo-speaks-out-against-daily-illini-editorial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uigeo.org/2009/10/18/geo-speaks-out-against-daily-illini-editorial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.uigeo.org/2009/10/18/geo-speaks-out-against-daily-illini-editorial/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To the editors:
In an October 15th editorial entitled &#8220;GEO request: Good idea, rough timing,&#8221; the Daily Illini Editorial Board argued that while a living wage is wholly deserved, the current budget situation makes asking for it illogical. Respectfully, the GEO begs to differ.
While the editorial correctly evaluates the importance of Teaching Assistants (TAs) by noting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the editors:<br />
In an October 15th editorial entitled &#8220;GEO request: Good idea, rough timing,&#8221; the Daily Illini Editorial Board argued that while a living wage is wholly deserved, the current budget situation makes asking for it illogical. Respectfully, the GEO begs to differ.<br />
While the editorial correctly evaluates the importance of Teaching Assistants (TAs) by noting that &#8220;our University would have a tough time functioning without them,&#8221; it leaves out the hard facts that back up this claim. In AY 08-09, 23.1% of all course hours on our campus were taught by TAs. Of the crucial 100 level courses that initiate freshmen students into the world of university academics, 40.5% were taught by TAs, many of whom are the sole instructor of record for their courses. In the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (LAS), the largest on our campus, one-third of all course hours were taught by TAs. As for the quality of our work, 83.3% of TAs received average scores of 4 or 5 on their ICES surveys, compared to 85.1% of faculty. Not too bad, considering that faculty members have the benefit of years of experience, as well as more control over syllabi, grading scales, etc. TAs are clearly an integral and positive part of the undergraduate experience, and a principal reason for the University&#8217;s stellar academic reputation, as evidenced by it&#8217;s current 9th place ranking in US News and World Report&#8217;s listing of US public universities. It should be noted, however, that the GEO also represents Graduate Assistants (GAs), who play a significant role in maintaining such campus facilities as libraries, performance arts centers, museums, recreational centers, health services, and specialized academic units. We are indeed students, but we are also workers who contribute crucial labor to our campus community.</p>
<p><span id="more-547"></span><br />
The Board&#8217;s editorial goes wrong when it attempts to characterize both the nature of our current contract negotiations and the state of the University&#8217;s budget. The GEO brought a comprehensive contract proposal to the bargaining table on April 21st of this year, the first day of negotiations with the administration. That proposal included not only a living wage, but also improvements to health and child care, as well as non-monetary issues such as tuition-waiver security. Despite multiple negotiation sessions, the administration&#8217;s bargaining team did not respond with a counter proposal until August 11th, nearly four months later and just four days before our previous contract expired. The administration&#8217;s proposal would have frozen our wages for three years, meaning that in an inflationary environment graduate employees would actually receive less compensation in terms of real wages. Moreover, the administration proposal would have removed basic labor rights, such as filing a grievance based on racial, gender, religious, ethnic, or other forms of discrimination. The administration also sought to reserve the right to fire or furlough graduate employees at will, with neither reason nor notice, and to compensate employees not with money, but with &#8220;in-kind&#8221; goods and services. Such a proposal is clearly unacceptable. As a result, graduate employees have been working under the terms of an expired contract for the entirety of this semester. We nonetheless continue to negotiate. Our bargaining team has presented serious counterproposals, including concessions on monetary issues. Each and every one of these proposals has been rejected or ignored by the administration.<br />
Whether due to a calculated omission or just a lack of knowledge, the Daily Illini Board&#8217;s editorial focuses exclusively on the issue of a living wage. In so doing, they misreport the current living wage for an academic year in Urbana-Champaign. The number they cite, $15,474, corresponds to AY 08-09. The living wage for the current academic year &#8211; as calculated by University administrators themselves and posted on the Graduate College&#8217;s website &#8211; is actually $16,086. This alone provides valuable testimony for the need to raise wages in response to inflation. What the editorial does not mention is that the administration&#8217;s calculation fails to factor in over $1,000 in fees that a graduate student will pay this year. (Worse yet, the editorial makes the completely false claim that graduate employees receive &#8220;book fees.&#8221; Such a fee category does not exist, and graduate employees spend significant amounts on books each semester.) A graduate employee working the standard 50% appointment and earning the current minimum salary of $13,430 will fall short of a minimum wage by $2,656 dollars before paying another $1,000 in fees. Overall, more than half of all TAs and GAs earn less than a living wage. Like undergraduates, we often make up the difference by taking out loans or working second jobs. Most graduate employees, however, are at a significantly different stage of life. We bear our financial burdens while maintaining grueling research and writing schedules, while trying to pay off our own undergraduate loans, and, in roughly ten percent of the cases, while raising families &#8211; with all of the extra financial and time constraints that go along with it. Meanwhile, international students, who comprise over one-third of the graduate student body (37.4% last year), are legally barred from taking additional work and must survive on their assistantships. Asking for enough money to live on while we juggle multiple sets of demanding responsibilities is in no way whatsoever a symptom of greed or a lack of logic. Rather, it is a thoroughly rational demand for the respect due to hard workers.<br />
Regardless, the Board maintains that demanding such respect in the face of current budget difficulties is illogical. The truth is that accepting the administration&#8217;s claims of budgetary crisis without further investigation is not only illogical, it is evidence of a failure to carry out the basic journalistic duties of research and fact checking. Less than one fifth of the University&#8217;s budget is derived from State revenues (in FY 09 it was 17.2%). The rest comes largely from tuition, grants, donations, investments, and self-sustaining sources of income. Last year on our campus tuition was increased by $401 per student, per semester, resulting in revenue growth of 14.5%. Investment income from the University&#8217;s endowment rose 5% last year and, as former President Joe White stated to the incoming Board of Trustees earlier this year, it has performed better than expected in our poor economy. What&#8217;s more, as the Daily Illini itself reported on August 19th, in FY 09 &#8220;the University brought in enough donations to experience one of the top five fundraising years in its 142-year history  all in spite of the economic downturn and the University admissions scandal.&#8221; The total represents &#8220;a 2.6% increase from fiscal year 2008.&#8221; And while it&#8217;s true that Illinois is in a difficult fiscal position, and that State politics have held up the approval of this year&#8217;s budget, it&#8217;s also true that the budget includes a 1.1% increase in funding for public higher education. Federal stimulus money, meanwhile, will provide an additional $53.3 million dollars this year. The University&#8217;s current fiscal issues are clearly not due to a lack of resources. In fact, raising the minimum salary for TAs and GAs to a living wage would cost less than two-tenths of one percent of the campus budget.<br />
Clearly, the financial burdens faced by graduate employees are due less to budget shortfalls than to major shortcomings in the administration&#8217;s priorities. UIUC&#8217;s FY 09 budget saw an increase of over $103 million, or 7%, from FY 08. Where was this increased funding allocated? Not especially to academic colleges, which saw much smaller increases: in LAS it was 2.8%, in Agriculture 2%, in Education 1.8%, and in Engineering 1.3%. Overall, the percentage of the budget directed to &#8220;instruction&#8221; rose only 0.8%. However, the Chief Information Officer&#8217;s budget rose by 10.9% and the Vice Chancellor for Institutional Advancement saw an increase of 12.1%. &#8220;Other Administrative Units&#8221; recorded an increase of 10.2%. While such figures indicate a bloated administration, it is even more helpful to point to concrete examples of egregious waste, such as the highly touted but dismally performing Global Campus, which lost a whopping $5.95 million last year before being severely downsized by the Board of Trustees. Worse yet, while graduate employees were working for substandard wages, Chancellor Herman was diverting over $300,000 of &#8220;discretionary funds&#8221; to insure that a couple dozen politically well-connected but undeserving students were accepted to law school. Once this ethical lapse was discovered, the administration spent at least another $440,000 dollars in legal fees as it responded to the Governor&#8217;s investigation. Later it was discovered that Chancellor Herman dipped further into his discretionary funds to provide a $115,000 salary to the Board of Trustees Chairman&#8217;s future-son-in-law.<br />
As a reward for their exemplary stewardship, our University&#8217;s top administrators receive vastly inordinate salaries and benefits. For example, in 2007-08 former President White earned $555,000 and had a house and a car provided by the state. In that same year, Chancellor Herman earned $427,500 and had a car provided by the state. As if this wasn&#8217;t enough, Herman received an 8.6% raise the following year. By way of comparison, a graduate employee earning the minimum salary of $13,002 received only a 3.3% increase. Even former President White&#8217;s ignoble downfall (which sadly required him to forfeit a $450,000 retention bonus) has provided a soft landing: he will be earning some $300,000 as a professor in the school of business.<br />
Despite the GEO&#8217;s clear signals that administrative costs, including salaries, should be among the first targets of any necessary cutbacks, the Daily Illini Board&#8217;s editorial falsely implies that we have suggested cutting faculty salaries. This is absolutely false. In fact, the GEO advocates for higher salaries for the increasing percentage of our faculty, such as adjuncts and visiting professors, that are not in tenure-track positions. Moreover, the GEO does not believe that higher education budgets are a zero-sum game, with one group of students or workers pitted against another. We understand our own efforts to be part of a much larger movement to restore public higher education to the level of fiscal priority that it once enjoyed, and still deserves, in our country. We have and will continue to lobby the Illinois State Legislature for increased funding for our public university system. As the photo which recently ran on the front page of the Daily Illini makes clear, GEO members were in attendance at the governor&#8217;s recent rally for the restoration of MAP funding. We are also currently working to support non-unionized, undergraduate TAs in the Chemistry department who have recently had their Spring tuition waivers repealed after the deadline to apply for federal financial aid &#8211; in some cases the only other available source of funding &#8211; had passed.<br />
Regarding tuition waivers, the Board&#8217;s editorial did not even mention that a major plank of the GEO&#8217;s bargaining platform is simply a guarantee that administrators will not withdraw the tuition waivers that have traditionally been a condition of graduate employment. Providing such a guarantee in the GEO contract would not increase University expenses in the least, but it would protect graduate employees from the very real possibility of losing the chance to finish their degrees. Just last year the GEO spearheaded a major drive to prevent the approval of a set of proposals, put forth by the Provost&#8217;s office, that would have stripped tuition waivers from many graduate employee positions. Without those waivers, graduate education would be a certain impossibility for many less privileged members of our society. Considering that just 6.6% of all graduate assistants are from &#8220;underrepresented&#8221; racial and ethnic categories, we can clearly not afford to take that step. The GEO works hard to help ensure access to higher education for all. By reducing the GEO&#8217;s position to a selfish and illogical grab for cash, the Editorial Board is insulting not only those of us who have worked strenuously and voluntarily for a cause in which we firmly believe, but also the integrity of the very newspaper that they purportedly serve.<br />
That integrity is severely undermined when the Board cites only the opinions of &#8220;several TAs&#8221; in order to justify the claim that the GEO &#8220;represents a small percentage of the entirety of graduate students and TAs.&#8221; The truth is that the GEO officially and legally represents over 2,700 graduate students who labor as TAs and GAs on our campus. One must also consider that, though we do not officially represent graduate students who work as Research Assistants (RAs) and Pre-Professional Graduate Assistants (PGAs), these students have received the same improvements in salary and benefits as the workers that we do represent. Those benefits are significant. Prior to 2003, when the GEO won a decade-long moral and legal battle for official recognition as a union, graduate employee wages had been frozen, dental and vision care was not included in the health insurance package, and the University made no contribution to graduate employees&#8217; health care premiums. Since the GEO began representing graduate employees in 2003, wages have increased yearly, grads enjoy dental and vision coverage, and the university contributes 50% of health care premium costs. These gains are just part of the basis for our widespread backing throughout campus. Especially in those departments where graduate degrees require multiple years of study and where salaries fall below a living wage, the GEO enjoys the active support of a majority of graduate students.<br />
We urge all members of the campus community to ignore the uninformed and hastily drawn conclusions of the Daily Illini Editorial Board. Pay heed, instead, to the voice of your democratically elected Student Senate, which just last Spring passed an official resolution in support of the GEO&#8217;s contract platform.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
The Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization (GEO)<br />
IFT/AFT Local 6300</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uigeo.org/2009/10/18/geo-speaks-out-against-daily-illini-editorial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>history</title>
		<link>http://www.uigeo.org/2008/07/01/history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uigeo.org/2008/07/01/history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.uigeo.org/2008/07/01/history/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The GEO has been organizing since the early 1990&#8217;s for democracy in the workplace, better education, increased stipends, better benefits, and other changes to make life as a Teaching, Research, or Graduate Assistant better.</p>
<p>
Graduate employees have been organizing at the University of Illinois since the early 1970s when a group called the Assistants Union first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GEO has been organizing since the early 1990&#8217;s for democracy in the workplace, better education, increased stipends, better benefits, and other changes to make life as a Teaching, Research, or Graduate Assistant better.</p>
<p><span id="more-343"></span><br />
Graduate employees have been organizing at the University of Illinois since the early 1970s when a group called the Assistants Union first worked to improve working conditions. In the late 1980s the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization got together to give voice to graduate assistant concerns over issues such as salaries, workload, and healthcare, as well as a perceived lack of campus parking. An early victory came when the GEO convinced the administration to delay payment of student fees until the first payday. Previously we had to pay by the regular deadline, which was often a financial strain for graduate employees. After initial success, this early GEO became inactive.</p>
<table width="15%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="6" align="left">
<tr>
<td>
<p><img src="../images/GEO_LOGO.GIF" width="108" height="109" align="left" border="0" alt="GEO Logo" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>In the fall of 1993, a new crop of graduate employees began building an active organization with the goal of matching the achievements of unions at the Universities of Michigan and Wisconsin. A steering committee researched working conditions and benefits for grad employees at the U of I and at peer institutions. In the spring of 1994 the GEO successfully rallied grads against the administration&#8217;s plan to stop issuing staff ID cards to assistants. With the ID cards assistants were able to retain many benefits such as staff parking, access to the Illini Credit Union, and discounts as state of Illinois employees.</p>
<p>During the 1994-95 academic year, the GEO grew and changed significantly. A lively organizing committee helped increase membership. In the spring of 1995, the GEO conducted a survey of assistants which showed strong support for unionization, as well as confirming the desire for improvements in healthcare and a new grievance procedure. Also<img src="../images/iftlogo.GIF" width="72" height="41" align="right" border="0" alt="IFT Logo" /> in the spring of 1995, after much research and discussion, GEO affiliated with the <a href="http://www.ift-aft.org/" target="_blank">Illinois Federation of Teachers</a>, joining over 70,000 Illinois educators in that organization. During the summer of 1995, along with other graduate employee unions in the <a href="http://www.aft.org" target="_blank">American Federation of Teachers</a>, we formed the Alliance of Graduate Employee Locals (AGEL).</p>
<p>In the fall of 1995, GEO members began a drive to gather signatures for a petition for a union election. The &quot;card drive&quot;&#8211;so named for the &quot;authorization cards&quot; we asked grads to sign as part of the petition &#8212; required the efforts of literally hundreds of GEO rank-and-file activists. Whether &quot;talking union&quot; with their co-workers, volunteering their Wednesday evenings to put out mass mailings, or standing on campus appealing to passing strangers (&quot;Are you a grad assistant?&quot;), member-organizers from every department made success a reality.</p>
<table width="25%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="6" align="left">
<tr>
<td>
<p><img src="../images/signing2.JPG" width="192" height="206" align="top" border="0" alt="Card Drive" /></p>
<p align="center"><b><i>GEO organizers sign-up new members at a table set up in the lobby of a university building.</i></b></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Of course, the administration helped out, too, by announcing plans to radically restructure the tuition waiver program and to end guaranteed full tuition waivers for future graduate employees. The crisis showed the usefulness of organization: the GEO was able to inform grad assistants about the changes, funnel their concerns to the administration, and build a coalition of graduate groups to oppose the changes. We also discovered the limits of our present organization. We got the administration to drop the most outrageous elements of their plan, but without a contract we could do nothing to stop most of the changes. A similar situation occurred with respect to healthcare. The GEO helped to secure improvements in healthcare and dental benefits, but these real changes in the benefits were minimal, and came from our raise pool. With these lessons in mind, graduate assistants signed on to the union effort in increasing numbers.</p>
<p>By April of 1996 <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000217.html">3,226 graduate assistants had signed cards</a> in support of the GEO&#8217;s call for a union election. The GEO filed these cards as a petition with the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board (IELRB) to request a union election. Instead of agreeing to an election, the administration chose to fight us in court arguing that graduate employees are students and therefore not covered by the Labor Act.</p>
<p>While the legal case wound its way slowly through hearings before an administrative law judge and later the full IELRB, graduate employees mobilized to demonstrate their desire for a union. In the spring of 1997, <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000218.html">graduate employees chose GEO as their union representative with 64% of the vote</a>. The election was overseen by a local group of ministers and lay workers. The university administration refused to recognize the results of that election, and rebuffed repeated efforts to engage them in dialogue during the fall of 1997.</p>
<table width="40%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" align="right">
<tr>
<td>
<p><img src="../images/toby_testify.jpg" width="351" height="210" border="0" alt="Toby Higbie at Labor Committee" /></p>
<p align="center"><b><i>GEO History Steward Toby Higbie testifies before the Illinois State House of Representatives&#8217; Labor Committee concerning House Bill 1208. With him are the bill&#8217;s sponsor Rep. Todd Stroger and IFT Legislative Director Karen Williams.</i></b></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Then in February of 1998 the GEO received the bad news that two of the three members of the Labor Board ruled that while student status did not constitute an explicit exclusion from the act, the work of graduate employees was so deeply intertwined with their education that their jobs were primarily educational. The dissenting opinion in that case argued that TAs and GAs are employees. The GEO immediately appealed the case to the Illinois Court of Appeals.</p>
<p>In April of 1998 the GEO held its first <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000219.html">&quot;Work-In,&quot;</a> a massive event that brought over 400 graduate employees to the Henry Administration Building to teach classes, grade papers, and educate the public about the goals of the GEO. Over the course of the next year we worked on passing legislation affirming graduate employees&#8217; collective bargaining rights and in March of 1999 <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000220.html">our bill passed the lower house of the General Assembly with bipartisan support</a>. Due to the lobbying of the university administration the bill was buried in the Senate Rules Committee and never came to a vote.</p>
<p>By that point, the GEO had pursued every established channel to win the right to represent ourselves. We were totally shut out of university decision-making. Repeated efforts to engage the administration in dialogue failed. Our members had even been denied the chance to sit on university committees dealing with employment issues and benefits.</p>
<p>But the tide was already turning in our direction. Two major legal decisions in the National Labor Relations Board cleared the way for student employees in the private sector to unionize. These cases didn?t necessarily set precedent for Illinois, but they didn?t hurt either. Meanwhile, the demise of House Bill 1208 sparked a new round of activism by graduate employees and more statements of support from the community.</p>
<table width="40%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" align="left">
<tr>
<td>
<p><img src="../images/fist.JPG" width="349" height="244" border="0" alt="Sit-in Rally 2000" /></p>
<p> <b><i><br />
<h4 align="center">GEO members and supporters rally outside the Henry Administration Building following the Spring 2000 sit-in.</h4>
<p> </i></b></td>
</tr>
<p> <<br />
/table>
<p>In early March <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000221.html">a student referendum (sponsored by the Illinois Student Government)</a> in support of graduate employees&#8217; right to union representation passed by a 77% margin. At the end of March, 55 graduate employees and supporters (including clergy, union members, and student government leaders) held a <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000222.html">20-hour sit-in at the Board of Trustees office</a> to draw public attention to the administration&#8217;s policy of non-recognition. Outside of the sit-in 200 supporters held rally in the afternoon, while about 50 braved the cold night air to stand in support of the action. Ten days later we held our largest-ever membership meeting.</p>
<p>On June 30, 2000 the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000223.html">Illinois Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision, overturned the IELRB&#8217;s decision</a> to deny graduate employees the right to choose union recognition. Calling the Labor Board&#8217;s decision &quot;clearly erroneous&quot; and based on an &quot;overly simplistic interpretation&quot; of Illinois educational labor law, the Court sent the case back to the Board for reconsideration. They must now allow &quot;those individuals whose assistantships are not significantly connected to their status as students &#8230; the same statutory right to organize as other educational employees.&quot; This decision opens the door for what graduate employees have wanted for so long &#8212; to exercise their democratic right to choose the GEO as their representative.</p>
<p>This decision was reaffirmed by the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000224.html">Illinois Supreme Court</a> on October 4, 2000 when they rejected the university administration&#8217;s appeal. We are now gearing up for an election where graduate employees will have the chance to vote for the GEO and begin negotiations with the administration for a contract.</p>
<p>The Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board (IELRB) approved preliminary guidelines for who will be allowed to vote in an upcoming union election for graduate employees at the University of Illinois. Their decision excluded virtually all of the Teaching, Research, and Graduate Assistants on the Urbana-Champaign campus.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000225.html">IELRB&#8217;s decision</a> denied the right to vote in a union election to all graduate students employed as teachers or researchers, as well as those assistants whose employment duties overlap with their academic &#8220;discipline&#8221;&#8211;a category suggested by the University of Illinois administration. Of the U of I&#8217;s approximately 5,200 grad employees, some 95% would be denied the ability to vote in a union election.</p>
<table width="40%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="6" align="right">
<tr>
<td>
<p><img src="../images/lincolnBW.jpg" alt="Work stoppage in fall 2001" width="384" height="288" align="right" /></p>
<p align="center"><i><b>Led by GEO Co-President Uma Pimplaskar, members of the GEO picket in front of Lincoln Hall during the Fall 2001 2-day walk out.</b></i></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>In response to the IELRB decision, the GEO membership voted to hold a <a href="../mt-archive/000235.html">two-day work stoppage</a> in the Fall of 2001. On November 28th and 29th, over 350 graduate employees in Gregory Hall, Lincoln Hall, English Building, Davenport Hall, and the Foreign Languages Building walked off the job. 70% of TAs in the target buildings took part, and 8-10,000 students were affected each day. Hundreds of GEO members and supporters picketed, chanted, and sang in the cold and rain on the Quad and around main administration buildings. The GEO was supported by a <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000233.html">resolution in the Illinois House of Representatives</a>, calling on the Administration to bargain with graduate employees. The GEO also had <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000239.html">support</a> from numerous groups throughout the community as well as the GEO at the University of Illinois&#8217; Chicago campus, who <a href="../mt-archive/000235.html">occupied the UIC Chancellor&#8217;s office</a> to show solidarity with our actions in Champaign-Urbana.</p>
<p>Despite the success of the work stoppage, the position of the UI Administration remained unchanged. Therefore, at the first membership meeting of 2002, GEO members authorized further actions, including work stoppages and the possibility of more other disruptive actions for later in the semester.</p>
<p>The GEO had already scheduled a <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000234.html">three-day strike</a> for the second week of April when on March 13, 2002 nearly 50 members and supporters of the GEO entered and <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000162.html">occupied the Swanlund Administration Building</a>. Beginning at 7:45 A.M. GEO members stood in all the entrances to prevent any University employees from entering the building. The building, which normally holds 100+ employees, was completely closed down by this action.</p>
<table width="50%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" align="left">
<tr>
<td>
<p><img src="../images/provost2.jpg" alt="Sit-in at Swanlund in Spring 2002" width="396" height="262" /></p>
<p align="center"><b><i>Provost Richard Herman (holding paper) and University Legal Counsel Steve Veazie (white shirt on right) present a proposal to GEO members occupying the Swanlund Administration Building during the sit-in of March 13, 2002. The administration agreed to enter into talks to reach an out-of-court settlement to the ongoing legal battle over collective bargaining rights for graduate employees. </i></b></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The action was timed to coincide with the arrival of the Board of Trustees to the Urbana-Champaign campus for a two-day meeting. GEO members were determined to stay until the administration agreed to begin negotiations with them over an out-of-court settlement to the now seven-year battle or until they were arrested. Bowing to the pressure of the sit-in and the upcoming walkout, University of Illinois officials reversed their long-standing policy of refusing to negotiate with the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization (GEO). Provost Herman, accompanied by Deputy University Legal Counsel Steve Veazie, conceded to a series of ongoing meetings with GEO representatives to determine which graduate employees would be eligible to vote in a union election and covered by a union contract. <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000231.html">(Click here for the full text of the March 13 agreement.)</a></p>
<p>As a result of the March 13th agreement, the University agreed to a series of negotiations to determine the scope of the bargaining unit. The GEO bargaining team advocated that all graduate employees (RAs, TAs, and GAs) be included in bargaining unit. However, the University argued that most grad employees should be excluded from collective bargaining.<br />
Weary of the University of Illinois? slow movement, graduate employees continued organizing toward a 3 day strike in mid-April. During the weeks up to the planned strike, the GEO notified the University that a report on negotiations would be given to the membership before graduate employees voted to continue with the plan to strike. After weeks of intense and lengthy negotiations, the University finally presented a revised proposal concerning bargaining unit membership. The day before the strike, the University agreed that almost all TAs and GAs be included in the bargaining unit. However, the University still did not agree that RAs have a right to collectively bargain.<br />
At the membership meeting the day before the strike, GEO members greeted the University?s proposal with excitement. Many were disappointed by the University?s position concerning RAs, but in general members agreed that this proposal was an immense victory. After nearly seven weeks of negotiations, the GEO and the University came to an <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000160.html"> agreement</a> on the composition of the   bargaining unit.<br />
Throughout the summer and fall of 2002, the GEO prepared for a union election. As part of the election drive, community organizations, churches, local labor unions, legislators and community leaders signed on to a letter to the University of Illinois asking that the University to remain neutral on the issue of whether employees should be represented collectively. The letter argued that union representation is a personal decision for employees and the letter specifically asked that the University of Illinois sign a pledge not to intimidate, harass or influence the union election.<br />
After the University refused to sign the pledge, the GEO organized a &#8220;free and fair election rally&#8221; on the steps of the Swanlund Administration Building to publicly encourage the University to sign the pledge. The University continued its silence.<br />
Having defined a large bargaining unit, the GEO urged the labor board to schedule the union election for Spring 2003.  The GEO supported a spring election for two reasons: 1. A spring election would give TAs an adequate time to evaluate union representation and 2. TAs excluded from the bargaining unit in their 1st semester would be eligible to vote. This would have allowed Chemistry, Biological Sciences, German, and Psychology graduate employees to vote in the union election. The University disagreed and the labor board scheduled the election for the week before fall finals: December 3-4, 2002.<br />
With only a month?s notice of the election date, the GEO initiated an intense organizing drive. Hundreds of graduate employees and labor volunteers talked with the over 2,500 TAs and GAs eligible to vote in the election. Despite the poor timing of the election, on December 3-4, 2002 over half of the eligible employees participated in the election. Graduate employees overwhelmingly voted for GEO to represent them at the bargaining table by a 3 to 1 margin (1188 to 347).</p>
<table width="50%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" align="left">
<tr>
<td>
<p><img src="http://www.uigeo.org/images/negotiations.jpg" align="left" width="450" alt="GEO Negotiating Team"></p>
<p align="center"><b><i>Our negotiators and observers at the April 1, 2003 session</i></b></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p> As a newly officially recognized union, the GEO elected an official bargaining team and voted on a bargaining platform in February, 2003. GEO members elected Rosemary Braun (RA in Physics) as chief negotiator and consciously elected RAs to demonstrate that the GEO advocates for all graduate employees regardless of employment status.
</p>
<p>Rather than easing into initial negotiations, the GEO again had to fight for an inclusive and transparent process. The University fought for closed-door negotiation meetings and argued that RAs should not be allowed at the negotiating table. The GEO did not back down from its position that all employees have a right to attend and participate in meetings and the University finally conceded to open and inclusive meetings.</p>
<table width="30%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="6" align="right">
<tr>
<td>
<p><img alt="healthcare_pick.jpg" src="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/healthcare_pick.jpg" width="240" height="150" align="right" border="0" /></p>
<p align="center"><i><b>Members of the GEO picket outside a bargaining session  Fall 2003</b></i></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p> As negotiations proceeded throughout the spring and the fall, the GEO expanded its membership and developed a stronger organizing infrastructure. Physics and Computer Science tripled their membership and participation while historically strong departments developed stronger communication networks.<br />
Over the summer in 2003, GEO negotiated a 3% raise for Fall 2003-2004, breaking a two-year wage freeze. Additionally, the University agreed to provide a dental and vision plan for graduate employees. These were major victories that set a strong precedent for future negotiations.
</p>
<table width="35%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" align="left">
<tr>
<td>
<p><img alt="ballot_counting.jpg" src="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/ballot_counting.jpg" width="300" height="191" align="left" border="0" /></p>
<p align="center"><i><b>Counting Ratification Ballots</b></i></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
Over 2003-2004, the GEO and the University continued negotiations that set the groundwork for the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000087.html"> GEO?s first contract </a>. In August 2004, GEO members ratified the first contract by a 98% margin (610 YES 10 NO). The contract guaranteed 3% wage increases per year, elimination of the McKinley clinic fee, and a phased reduction of medical insurance premiums. In addition, the GEO successfully negotiated a series of employee protections, including a grievance procedure with 3rd-party binding arbitration, a non-discrimination clause, and Fair Share, which allows the union to more effectively bargain with the university and enforce the contract.<br />
Over the course of 2004-2006, the GEO focused on streamlining the grievance process and advocating for better healthcare for grads and their dependents. As the first contract expired in August 2006, grads returned to the bargaining table hoping to focus on healthcare. Negotiations went slowly, but grads with the help of our fellow workers on campus put pressure on the University and by Spring 2007 the GEO ratified an improved contract for 2006-2008 with back-pay and a greater subsidy of graduate healthcare and wages.</p>
<p>
<img alt="union_united_small.jpg" src="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/union_united_small.jpg" align="right" width="300" height="275" border="0" />In 2007-2008 the GEO focused on building membership and developing stronger relationships with community organizations and campus labor groups. In Fall 2007 we supported campus building and food service workers union SEIU in their negotiation for pay equity and greater worker protections. In Spring 2008 we hosted the Alliance of Graduate Employee Locals (AGEL) conference. Representatives from GEO-University of Michigan, TAA-University of Wisconsin, GTFF- University of Oregon, GAU-University of Florida and other graduate employee unions joined us to discuss national organizing strategies, how to build local coalitions, and developing membership.<br />
Approaching Fall 2008 the GEO is preparing for the next contract cycle. The current contract expires in August 2009, but we hope to begin negotiations in the spring. Ultimately winning a strong third contract will require the support of all graduate employees. Volunteers are needed to visit grads in their offices, research healthcare issues, work with other graduate employee unions on international student visa reform and much more. <br />
If you have questions about the GEO or want to know how you can get involved, please contact the GEO office at 344-8283 or at geo(AT)uigeo.org.<br />
Stay Tuned!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uigeo.org/2008/07/01/history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full Text of 2006-2009 TA/GA Contract</title>
		<link>http://www.uigeo.org/2007/04/05/full-text-of-2006-2009-taga-contract/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uigeo.org/2007/04/05/full-text-of-2006-2009-taga-contract/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.uigeo.org/2007/04/05/full-text-of-2006-2009-taga-contract/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>(signed 3/26/07)</p>
<p>TABLE OF CONTENTS</p>
<p>ARTICLE I PURPOSE 
ARTICLE II RECOGNITION 
ARTICLE III NONDISCRIMINATION
STATEMENT
ARTICLE IV APPOINTMENT TERMS
ARTICLE V ORIENTATION AND TRAINING 
ARTICLE VI EVALUATIONS
ARTICLE VII HOURS OF WORK
ARTICLE VIII USE OF UNIVERSITY
RESOURCES
ARTICLE IX MANAGEMENT RIGHTS
ARTICLE X EMPLOYEE RIGHTS
ARTICLE XI EXPENSES
ARTICLE XII DISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION 
ARTICLE XIII PERSONNEL FILES
ARTICLE XIV STIPENDS
ARTICLE XV HEALTH CARE
ARTICLE XVI DUES DEDUCTION AND
FAIR [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(signed 3/26/07)<br /><br/></p>
<p>TABLE OF CONTENTS</p>
<p><a href="#Purpose">ARTICLE I PURPOSE </a><br />
<a href="#Recognition">ARTICLE II RECOGNITION </a><br />
<a href="#Nondiscrimination">ARTICLE III NONDISCRIMINATION<br />
STATEMENT</a><br />
<a href="#Appointment">ARTICLE IV APPOINTMENT TERMS</a><br />
<a href="#Orientation">ARTICLE V ORIENTATION AND TRAINING </a><br />
<a href="#Evaluations">ARTICLE VI EVALUATIONS</a><br />
<a href="#Hours">ARTICLE VII HOURS OF WORK</a><br />
<a href="#Resources">ARTICLE VIII USE OF UNIVERSITY<br />
RESOURCES</a><br />
<a href="#Management">ARTICLE IX MANAGEMENT RIGHTS</a><br />
<a href="#Employee">ARTICLE X EMPLOYEE RIGHTS</a><br />
<a href="#Expenses">ARTICLE XI EXPENSES</a><br />
<a href="#Information">ARTICLE XII DISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION </a><br />
<a href="#Personnel">ARTICLE XIII PERSONNEL FILES</a><br />
<a href="#Stipends">ARTICLE XIV STIPENDS</a><br />
<a href="#Health">ARTICLE XV HEALTH CARE</a><br />
<a href="#Dues">ARTICLE XVI DUES DEDUCTION AND<br />
FAIR SHARE</a><br />
<a href="#Leaves">ARTICLE XVII LEAVES AND HOLIDAYS</a><br />
<a href="#Grievance">ARTICLE XVIII GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE</a><br />
<a href="#Safety">ARTICLE XIX HEALTH AND SAFETY</a><br />
<a href="#Labor">ARTICLE XX LABOR MANAGEMENT<br />
MEETINGS AND CONSULTATION</a><br />
<a href="#Scope">ARTICLE XXI SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT</a><br />
<a href="#Savings">ARTICLE XXII SAVINGS CLAUSE</a><br />
<a href="#Strike">ARTICLE XXIII NO STRIKE</a><br />
<a href="#Duration">ARTICLE XXIV DURATION</a><br />
<a href="#MOU">MEMO OF UNDERSTANDING: SPEAK TEST COMMITTEE</a></p>
<p><span id="more-300"></span><br />
<a name="Purpose" id="Purpose"></a>
<p><strong>I. Purpose </strong><br />
It is the intent and purpose of this Agreement to promote sound and mutually<br />
beneficial relationships between the University and the Union. 
</p>
<p><a name="Recognition" id="Recognition"></a>
<p><strong>II. Recognition </strong><br />
Section 2.1. The University hereby recognizes the Graduate Employees Organization,<br />
IFT/AFT, AFL-CIO (&#8220;Union&#8221;) as the exclusive representative for<br />
wages, hours, terms and conditions of employment for all employees within<br />
the bargaining unit as certified by the IELRB in Case No. 96-RC-0013-S (See<br />
Appendix A &#8211; &#8220;Stipulations&#8221; dated April 29, 2002), as follows:</p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>
Included: assistants who are graduate students in good standing at the<br />
University&#8217;s Urbana-Champaign campus and who have appointments<br />
as either Teaching Assistants (except for the initial semester when teaching<br />
is required by the departments listed below) or Graduate Assistants;<br />
and either hold a total appointment between .25 FTE and .67 FTE, or who<br />
receive a tuition and fee waiver from an assistantship appointment. Only<br />
those hours/duties spent by a graduate employee in the satisfaction of<br />
his/her included (TA or GA) appointment will be included in the bargaining<br />
unit;<br />
Excluded: Research Assistants (RA) and Pre-professional Graduate Assistants<br />
(PGA) as defined in the attached stipulations referenced above. Teaching<br />
Assistants in the following departments will be excluded from the bargaining<br />
unit only for the first semester that they teach: Animal Biology; Biochemistry;<br />
Cell and Structural Biology; Chemistry; Germanic Languages &amp; Literature;<br />
Microbiology; Plant Biology; and Psychology. Teaching Assistants or Graduate<br />
Assistants who are supervisors, managerial employees, confidential employees,<br />
or short-term employees as defined by the IELRA are excluded from the bargaining<br />
unit; and all other employees.</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>
Section 2.2. The Employer agrees not to negotiate with any other labor organization,<br />
its agent, or any employee organization, or campus organization over wages,<br />
hours, terms and conditions of employment, for all employees within the bargaining<br />
unit. (Appendix A), unless specified otherwise elsewhere in this document.<br />
This Agreement shall not be construed to prevent the University or any administrator<br />
or faculty member from meeting with any University organization or group,<br />
including student organizations, to hear their views on any matter. No changes<br />
in any terms or conditions of employment that fall within the mandatory scope<br />
of bargaining will be made as a result of any such meetings except by mutual<br />
agreement of the University and GEO.</p>
<p><a name="Nondiscrimination" id="Nondiscrimination"></a>
<p><strong>III. Nondiscrimination Statement </strong><br />
There will be no discrimination by either the Union or the University with respect to any assistant covered by this Agreement because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, ancestry, age, marital status, disability, sexual orientation, including gender identity, unfavorable discharge from the military, or status as a protected veteran or a veteran of the Vietnam Area. </p>
<p>Each assistant may make his/her own personal decision with respect to the Union<br />
or other employee organization membership, without intimidation or coercion.<br />
There will be no discrimination against any assistant because of Union membership<br />
or because the assistant is acting as a representative of the Union or its<br />
members pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.</p>
<p>Assistants are encouraged to resolve complaints of discrimination under this<br />
Agreement under Policy and Procedures for Addressing Discrimination and Harassment<br />
at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Assistants retain the right<br />
to resolve complaints of discrimination under the Grievance Procedure. An assistant<br />
must choose whether a particular complaint will be resolved using the University<br />
process or the Grievance Procedure within thirty (30) calendar days following<br />
an occurrence on which the complaint is based.</p>
<p><a name="Appointment" id="Appointment"></a>
<p><strong>IV. Appointment Terms </strong><br />
A. Eligibility for Assistantship Appointments<br />
A TA or GA must be enrolled as a student and in good academic standing in a<br />
graduate program at UIUC and meet other applicable requirements. Campus policy<br />
does not require students who hold summer assistantships to be registered during<br />
the summer if they were registered for the immediately preceding spring semester<br />
or are registered for the immediately following fall semester. However, campus<br />
policy permits individual departments to require their students who hold summer<br />
assistantships to register for a specified minimum number of units during the<br />
summer as part of the students&#8217; academic programs. If an individual,<br />
who has accepted a TA or GA appointment, fails to enroll, withdraws or otherwise<br />
fails to maintain academic eligibility in a graduate program, the University<br />
may, in its sole discretion, cancel the assistantship appointment. Cancellation<br />
under this section shall not be subject to appeal under the Grievance Procedure. <strong></strong> </p>
<p>B.	Information about Assistantships</p>
<ul>1.	In order to make information available to graduate students about assistantship opportunities, the Graduate College maintains an Assistantship Clearing house website:  http:/www.grad.uiuc.edu/clearinghouse/   This website may include (or provide a link to) the information stipulated in B.2.</ul>
<ul>2.	Units employing or anticipating the employment of TAs or GAs are encouraged to maintain posted information about openings, such as information about the:</ul>
<ul>a.	Name or location of an office where inquiries or applications may 				be made.</ul>
<ul>b.	Types of TA or GA positions that typically are available.</ul>
<ul>c.	Procedure(s) to apply for TA and GA positions, including (if 				applicable) deadlines for submission of application.</ul>
<ul>3.	Units will allow applicants to submit, in writing, course placement 				preferences. </ul>
<p>
C. Required Documentation<br />
All appointments are contingent upon the student&#8217;s compliance with documentation<br />
requirements for employment. Currently these requirements include (for students<br />
who have never held an assistantship or other appointment at the University,<br />
or have not held an appointment in the last 90 days) completion of the I-9<br />
and employee information forms as soon as possible after the offer of appointment<br />
is made and, in every case, before the assistant performs any services associated<br />
with the appointment. </p>
<p>D. Notice of Appointment<br />
All newly appointed and re-appointed TAs and GAs shall be notified of their<br />
appointment title, the major components of their assignments, stipend amount,<br />
dates (duration) of service (including any mandatory or optional orientation<br />
sessions), the supervising official in the department, and the full time equivalency<br />
(FTE) of the appointment as soon as practicable, preferably at least sixty<br />
(60) days before the start of the appointment or one month before the end of<br />
the previous appointment. Such notification shall include a statement that<br />
the position is subject to a collective bargaining agreement between the Board<br />
of Trustees of the University of Illinois and the Graduate Employees Organization<br />
covering wages, hours, terms and conditions of employment which may be found<br />
at the following web address: :  http://www.ahr.uiuc.edu/ or http://www.uigeo.org/ .<br />
Additional information about tuition and fees applicable to all graduate students may be obtained from the following websites.<br />
Office of Admissions and Records:  http://www.oar.uiuc.edu/current/financial/grad_fees.html<br />
Graduate College:  http://www.grad.uiuc.edu/gradhandbook/index.asp<br />
Tuition and fees waivers may vary between units and programs.  Employing units are encouraged to explain their tuition and fee waiver policies as part of their websites and make information available to incoming students.</p>
<p>E. Acceptance<br />
A student who has been offered a TA or GA appointment is required to confirm<br />
acceptance to the department in writing (including electronic mail), within<br />
the time period specified by the department. If an offer has been made to an<br />
assistant for one or more specific periods in an academic year and the assistant<br />
has accepted the offer and met the conditions of the offer and the position<br />
is later unavailable, the University will notify the assistant of the reasons<br />
for the appointment being unavailable and the assistant will be placed in an<br />
appointment with equivalent compensation as the position originally offered<br />
and accepted. Once accepted, terms of the appointment (e.g., stipend, percent-time,<br />
dates of appointment) may not be changed except by mutual agreement between<br />
the department and assistant or as otherwise provided for in this Agreement.<br />
Assignments and duties may be changed at the discretion of the department,<br />
with notice to the assistant.<br />
Acceptance of an appointment requires the assistant to be present and available<br />
to perform assigned duties during those dates. Failure to be present to perform<br />
assigned duties may result in dismissal.</p>
<p>F. Duration of Appointments<br />
An assistant shall be appointed for a specific period of not less than one<br />
semester or for a special limited purpose. A &quot;special limited purpose&quot; appointment<br />
is employment that covers unforeseen needs that arise during a semester that<br />
may be for less than one semester. In all cases, employment ends at the expiration<br />
of the specific period as specified in the appointment letter or when the special<br />
limited purpose is completed.</p>
<p>G. Resignation/Release<br />
Assistants must provide a minimum of fourteen (14) calendar days notice prior<br />
to the effective date of resignation. A written release from the appointing<br />
unit is required if an assistant wishes to resign after acceptance of an appointment<br />
in order to accept another assistantship appointment. </p>
<p>H. Renewal of Appointments<br />
TAs and GAs whose academic progress and service record have been determined<br />
to be satisfactory are eligible for reappointment at the sole discretion of<br />
the department, based on the past performance of the assistant, availability<br />
of funds and the University&#8217;s determination of the need for services.<br />
Departments are encouraged to communicate with assistants concerning plans or prospects for new assistantship appointments after the term of their current appointments end.  However, a new appointment is not guaranteed unless and until the department issues to the student the notice of appointment described in Section IV D above.  Departments have differing policies on the length of time students may hold<br />
assistantships and sometimes limit the total number of semesters that an assistant<br />
may serve. In accord with the University&#8217;s standard of excellence, TAs<br />
and Gas must maintain a high standard of performance in their duties, as solely<br />
determined by the appointing unit, in order for their assistantships to be<br />
renewed.</p>
<p>I. Procedure for Unsatisfactory Performance<br />
When assistantship performance is unsatisfactory, the assistantship duties<br />
may be reduced and appointment fraction and pay may be reduced correspondingly,<br />
or the assistant may be dismissed. In cases where assistantship performance<br />
is unsatisfactory, the matter will first be discussed with the assistant prior<br />
to any action being taken. An assistant shall be given two (2) business days<br />
advance notice of such a discussion. An assistant shall be entitled to the<br />
presence of a Union Representative at such a discussion if he/she has reasonable<br />
grounds to believe that the results of the discussion may be used to support<br />
disciplinary action against him/her and requests the Union representation. <br />
If the University determines that the existing situation can be corrected by<br />
the assistant and is of such a nature that correction is appropriate, the assistant<br />
will be given not less than seven (7) calendar days from date of discussion<br />
to make the correction. A written summary of such a discussion will be available<br />
at the written request of the assistant provided the request is received within<br />
two (2) business days of the discussion. The summary shall be provided within<br />
two (2) business days of the request.</p>
<p><strong>J. Dismissal</strong><br />
Dismissal is termination of an assistantship during a semester or other period<br />
of appointment. The parties recognize the authority of the University to dismiss<br />
or take other appropriate disciplinary action against an assistant for just<br />
cause, which shall include but not be limited to the following reasons: failing<br />
to attend mandatory orientation or other sessions; engaging in misconduct in<br />
the performance of University duties or academic activities; neglecting or<br />
refusing to perform assigned duties; demonstrating unsatisfactory performance;<br />
violating University regulations or policies; violating University regulations<br />
or policies related to discrimination and harassment; acting outside the appropriate<br />
exercise of University responsibilities so as willfully to physically harm,<br />
threaten physical harm to, harass or intimidate a visitor or a member of the<br />
University community with the effect of interfering with that person&#8217;s<br />
performance of University duties or academic activities; or damaging, destroying<br />
or misappropriating property owned by the University or any property used in<br />
connection with a University function or approved activity. Dismissal may result<br />
from an accumulation of minor infractions as well as for a single serious infraction.<br />
The assistant will be provided with written notice and an opportunity to respond<br />
to the Unit Executive Officer prior to dismissal. </p>
<p>A supervisor alerted to the possibility of misconduct by an assistant shall<br />
attempt to resolve the issue and clarify the facts directly with the assistant.<br />
Discipline shall be issued in a private manner so as not to cause embarrassment<br />
to the assistant. Discipline short of dismissal may be taken which may include<br />
a Written Reprimand. A Written Reprimand shall state the facts supporting the<br />
discipline and be in the form of an official, signed letter. The assistant<br />
will be provided with an opportunity to respond to the supervisor and, if desired,<br />
to the Unit Executive Officer. Discipline in the form of a Written Reprimand<br />
is not required prior to seeking to dismiss an assistant.<br />
If any discipline is taken against an assistant, the assistant will receive<br />
a copy of the disciplinary action. <br />
When an investigatory interview is appropriate, the University shall give the<br />
assistant two (2) business days advance notice of its intent to hold an investigatory<br />
interview. An assistant shall be entitled to the presence of a Union Representative<br />
during any investigatory interview if he/she has reasonable grounds to believe<br />
that the results of the interview may be used to support disciplinary action<br />
against him/her and requests the Union representation. </p>
<p>K. Appeals<br />
If a determination results in a dismissal or a reduction in fraction of employment<br />
and pay during the term of appointment, a grievance may be submitted beginning<br />
at Level 2 of the Grievance Procedure, provided the grievance is submitted<br />
in writing within the fifteen (15) calendar days following notice of the dismissal<br />
or reduction. In the event of arbitration, if the arbitrator does not find<br />
for the University, the arbitrator may only make a finding of fact and award<br />
pay but not reinstatement. Such pay shall not exceed an amount that the assistant<br />
would have earned from the date of dismissal to the end of the term of appointment.</p>
<p><a name="Orientation" id="Orientation"></a>
<p><strong>V. Orientation and Training </strong><br />
A. Campus and departmental responsibility<br />
The campus and the units that appoint teaching and graduate assistants are<br />
jointly responsible for providing appropriate orientation and continuing training<br />
programs for the assistants they appoint. Appointing units are responsible<br />
for defining the requirements and duties of TAs specific to their disciplines<br />
and job duties for GAs. TA duties vary widely across campus and within departments,<br />
ranging from classroom teaching and lab instruction to individual instruction<br />
and grading. GA duties primarily support administrative functions and range<br />
from clerical and technical duties to advising and outreach.</p>
<p>B. TA orientation or pre-service training<br />
Mandatory orientation or pre-service training is provided to teaching assistants<br />
prior to their first term of service as a TA. The campus-wide TA orientation<br />
program covers topics such as the role of the teaching assistant, pedagogical<br />
theory and practice, and diversity in the classroom. Departmental orientation<br />
programs focus on discipline-specific content and teaching practices. Course-specific<br />
information is provided by the instructors or directors of courses to which<br />
TAs are assigned. New international TAs must also attend the International<br />
TA Orientation offered by the Office of Instructional Resources.</p>
<p>C. TA continuing or in-service training<br />
Appointing departments or course supervisors are required to explain to their<br />
TAs the nature of the in-service training program in which they are required<br />
to participate. Throughout their service as teaching assistants, TAs participate<br />
in staff meetings with their faculty supervisors and other TAs assigned to<br />
the same course. These meetings provide formal and informal opportunities to<br />
address with peers and supervisors any problems and concerns, to clarify the<br />
department&#8217;s and supervisor&#8217;s expectations for TAs, and to develop<br />
the TAs&#8217; skills as teachers. Through these meetings TAs may request more<br />
information or individual attention to address subjects and skills where they<br />
feel the need for improvement, and supervisors may identify areas that need<br />
improvement and devise means of addressing these areas (e.g., additional discussions<br />
of pedagogical strategies and techniques, micro-teaching, class visitation<br />
to provide feedback about progress, visiting classes taught by other TAs to<br />
observe their teaching). <br />
For a classroom TA, an important component of training and development is direct<br />
observation of the TA&#8217;s teaching by a faculty supervisor or other staff<br />
member, often a more experienced TA. Such a class visitation is followed by<br />
a meeting between the TA and the observer to discuss observations and suggest<br />
improvements. The first visit to a TA&#8217;s class shall be scheduled at least<br />
24 hours in advance. Subsequent visits may be scheduled or unscheduled. </p>
<p>D. GA training<br />
The units that appoint graduate assistants are responsible for providing appropriate<br />
training related to their assistantship duties.</p>
<p>E. Attendance<br />
Attendance at mandatory orientation or training activities is required for<br />
continuation of a teaching or graduate assistantship. In the event that mandatory<br />
training begins before an assistant&#8217;s appointment term, the assistant<br />
will be compensated at a rate proportional to the assistant&#8217;s stipend<br />
for time spent in training only.</p>
<p>F. Oral English proficiency of international students<br />
In order to qualify for appointment as a teaching assistant, all non-native<br />
English speaking graduate students must first satisfy the English proficiency<br />
admission requirements of the Graduate College and the appointing academic<br />
unit. These requirements may be satisfied by earning a minimum required score<br />
on the TSE test or on-campus by earning a minimum required score on the SPEAK<br />
test. Final screening for oral English proficiency takes place during the all-campus<br />
orientation for new international students. [Campus Administrative Manual,<br />
section IX-C-8]. <br />
If a unit makes a written offer which is conditioned on the student satisfying<br />
the oral English proficiency requirements for teaching established by the campus<br />
and the appointing academic unit, then the offer must state that condition<br />
as part of the terms of the appointment. If a unit makes a written offer of<br />
a teaching assistantship to an assistant and does not state the condition of<br />
satisfying the oral English proficiency requirements for teaching, and the<br />
assistant accepts the offer in writing, but the assistant subsequently fails<br />
to satisfy oral English requirements, then so long as the assistant has met<br />
the other conditions of the offer, the unit must appoint the assistant to a<br />
non-teaching position with equivalent compensation and duration as the position<br />
originally offered and accepted. Such assistant will not be allowed to provide<br />
instruction until a passing score on the SPEAK test has been achieved. All<br />
such assistants who have not passed the SPEAK test will be required to participate<br />
in an approved proficiency training program prior to retaking the SPEAK test.<br />
Units may require such assistants to repeat the proficiency training program<br />
and re-take the SPEAK test until a passing score is attained. The University<br />
shall make approved, on-campus English language proficiency training programs<br />
available at no cost to the assistant. </p>
<p><a name="Evaluations" id="Evaluations"></a><strong>VI. Evaluations </strong><br />
A. Performance of TAs and GAs will normally be reviewed at least once during<br />
the academic year or term of the appointment, whichever is greater.</p>
<p>B. Appointing units shall inform new TAs and GAs of their evaluation procedure<br />
during orientation or at the beginning of the appointment and inform re-appointed TAs and GAs of the evaluation procedures upon beginning new assignments or when evaluation procedures are changed. Evaluations shall be based on the assistants&#8217; performance of assistantship duties. </p>
<p>C. Evaluations of teaching may include input from sources such as: (1) student<br />
evaluations of the teaching performance of a teaching assistant; (2) faculty<br />
and staff review of the assistant&#8217;s performance; (3) scheduled and unscheduled<br />
classroom observations; and, (4) self-review. </p>
<p>D. Supervising faculty are encouraged to informally discuss a TA&#8217;s performance<br />
with the TA on an ongoing basis throughout the appointment period. The faculty<br />
supervisor may provide a formal evaluation for the TA&#8217;s personnel file<br />
in the department, in which case a copy must be provided to the assistant and<br />
so noted on the evaluation. </p>
<p>E. Supervisors of a GA are also encouraged to informally discuss a GA&#8217;s<br />
performance &#8216;<br />
or the appointment period directly with the GA. The supervisor may provide<br />
a formal evaluation for the GA&#8217;s personnel file in the department, in<br />
which case a copy must be provided to the assistant and so noted on the evaluation.</p>
<p>F. An assistant may request that his/her supervisor observe the assistant&#8217;s work performance and/or provide a written evaluation.  The supervisor will use his/her best efforts to conduct such observation and/or provide a written evaluation to the assistant (once per semester) within a reasonable period of time, normally thirty (30) days.</p>
<p>G. Assistants shall have the opportunity to comment in writing upon any written<br />
evaluations provided by faculty and staff, including their department supervisors.<br />
Such comments shall be placed in the assistant&#8217;s personnel record maintained<br />
by the appointing unit. The evaluation material in the personnel record shall<br />
be signed and dated by the author(s) and may be signed and dated by the assistant<br />
indicating the assistant has received a copy of the evaluation. If an assistant<br />
signs his or her evaluation, the assistant shall have the option to request<br />
the following disclaimer: &#8220;Assistant&#8217;s signature confirms only<br />
that the supervisor has discussed and given a copy to the Assistant and does<br />
not indicate agreement or disagreement.&#8221;</p>
<p><a name="Hours" id="Hours"></a><strong>VII. Hours of Work </strong><br />
A. Assistants&#8217; hours of work are reflected in their percentage of appointment.<br />
Such hours of work are separate and distinct from the time required for an<br />
assistant&#8217;s own academic coursework.</p>
<p>B. It is understood that assistants in this bargaining unit are engaged in<br />
professional activities of such a nature that the output produced, or the result<br />
accomplished, cannot be precisely standardized or measured in relation to a<br />
given period of time and that the time necessary to accomplish an assignment<br />
may vary. </p>
<p>C. The appointment level (full time equivalency or FTE) shall be based on the<br />
appointing department&#8217;s determination of the amount of time it should<br />
normally take to perform the assigned duties including orientation and training.<br />
It is expected that a .5 FTE assistant will devote an average of 20 hours per<br />
week over the course of a full appointment period. Assistants appointed for<br />
other FTE levels would be expected to perform work for a proportionately greater<br />
or lesser average number of hours per week.</p>
<p>D. If an assistant reasonably believes that his/her duties routinely require<br />
hours which will cumulatively exceed the hours of effort required by the appointment<br />
percentage over the full term, he/she must raise the matter within 5 calendar<br />
days from the point the assistant deems the cumulative workload to be excessive<br />
with his/her department supervisor. Upon meeting with the assistant, if the<br />
department supervisor concludes that the assistant is working excessive hours<br />
based on his/her assigned FTE, the supervisor may suggest with the assistant&#8217;s<br />
cooperation, that the assistant meet with and be mentored by more experienced<br />
assistants or other academic staff members in order to develop strategies for<br />
completing the assigned duties at a high level of quality in time contemplated<br />
by the assistant&#8217;s FTE appointment. Further, the supervisor may determine:<br />
(1) that certain duties be reduced and/or reassigned to others; (2) the assistant&#8217;s<br />
FTE be increased; or (3) the assistant&#8217;s FTE be reduced with the consent<br />
of the assistant; and/or (4) that the assistant be reassigned to a different<br />
position. </p>
<p>E. An assistant may appeal the department supervisor&#8217;s final determination<br />
in writing to the Unit Executive Officer (UEO) within five (5) calendar days of<br />
the determination. The UEO will review the department supervisor&#8217;s determination<br />
and issue a letter to the assistant either agreeing with, modifying or reversing<br />
the determination within five (5) calendar days of the appeal.</p>
<p><a name="Resources" id="Resources"></a>
<p><strong>VIII. Use of University Resources </strong><br />
An assistant may not utilize University of Illinois&#8217; course materials,<br />
curricula, facilities, resources, or other materials in non-University activities.</p>
<p><a name="Management" id="Management"></a>
<p><strong>IX. Management Rights </strong><br />
A. Except as specifically abridged by this Agreement, all powers, rights, and<br />
authority of the University are reserved by the University, and the University<br />
retains sole and exclusive control over any and all matters in the operation,<br />
management and administration of the University, the control of its properties<br />
and the maintenance of order and efficiency of the workforce, and complete<br />
authority to exercise those rights and powers by making and implementing<br />
decisions with respect to those rights and powers. Such rights and powers<br />
include, but are not limited to, the exclusive right and power <br />
(1) to determine the mission of the University, the organizational structure,<br />
and the methods and means necessary to fulfill that mission, including the<br />
transfer, alteration, curtailment or discontinuance of any services; <br />
(2) to adopt and amend budgets and make budgetary allocations or reallocations<br />
affecting the University as a whole or any of its departments or units; <br />
(3) to establish qualifications, appoint, and determine the appointment fraction<br />
and duration of employment upon appointment for all assistants, including whether<br />
assistants will be re-appointed and, if so, the terms and conditions governing<br />
such reappointment; <br />
(4) to determine the number of assistants to be appointed or reappointed; <br />
(5) to determine, assign, and schedule the type and kind of services and the<br />
work to be performed by assistants or by others, including the job content<br />
and the location of such services or work; <br />
(6) to establish, modify, combine or eliminate job classifications within the<br />
bargaining unit; <br />
(7) to determine the number, location, or relocation of facilities, buildings<br />
and rooms, and ancillary facilities such as parking lots, including the policies<br />
governing the use of such buildings, rooms or facilities; <br />
(8) to discipline, suspend, or discharge assistants for just cause; <br />
(9) to supervise, train, and evaluate assistants; <br />
(10) to determine materials and equipment to be utilized by assistants and<br />
the methods and means by which work shall be performed and services provided; <br />
(11) to establish quality and performance standards rules for assistants; <br />
(12) to adopt and enforce policies, rules and regulations, including rules<br />
and regulations governing tuition waivers and the work, training, and conduct<br />
of assistants; <br />
(13) to utilize personnel, methods, and means in the most appropriate and efficient<br />
manner possible as determined by the University; and <br />
(14) to perform all other functions inherent in the administration, management,<br />
and control of the University.<br />
B. It is further agreed, except as abridged by the specific terms of this Agreement,<br />
that the University retains sole and exclusive control: <br />
(1) to make all academic judgments concerning: (a) courses, curriculum, and<br />
instruction; (b) the content of courses, instructional materials, the nature<br />
and form of assignments required including examinations and other work; (c)<br />
methods of instruction; (d) class size; and (e) grading policies and practices. <br />
(2) the right to determine all academic policies, procedures, rules and regulations<br />
in regard to assistants&#8217; status as students, including, but not limited<br />
to, all questions of academic standing, intellectual integrity, and any matter<br />
relating to academic progress in a University educational program; and,<br />
(3) to make academic evaluations and determinations of assistants&#8217; progress<br />
as students, including the fulfillment of degree requirements. <br />
C. Nothing contained in this description of Employer&#8217;s rights waives<br />
the Union&#8217;s right to collectively bargain mandatory subjects of bargaining<br />
not covered by this</p>
<p>
<a name="Employee" id="Employee"></a>
<p><strong>Agreement. X. Employee Rights </strong><br />
A. An employee&#8217;s department or unit shall make arrangements for the employee&#8217;s<br />
access to his/her office, lab, studio or similar work place and to the building<br />
containing that work place.</p>
<p>B. Each department or unit shall make available a designated mailbox for employees<br />
to receive mail.</p>
<p>C. A department or unit will provide telephone access and suitable workspace,<br />
as necessary for the fulfillment of the employee&#8217;s work obligations</p>
<p>D. A department or unit will provide access to supplies and equipment as necessary<br />
to fulfill the assistant&#8217;s work obligation without cost to the assistant. </p>
<p>E. The University shall make a good faith effort to make accommodations for<br />
international assistants experiencing difficulties acquiring the documentation<br />
necessary for employment. This shall include the use of temporary control numbers<br />
or other means to process the employment information of international employees,<br />
and may include an offer of deferred employment</p>
<p><a name="Expenses" id="Expenses"></a>
<p><strong>XI. Expenses </strong><br />
A. Travel<br />
When assistants are required by their appointing units to travel in relations<br />
to their TA or GA duties, the University will reimburse the assistants for<br />
such travel. The University&#8217;s Business and Financial Policies and Procedures<br />
provides complete guidelines for these reimbursements. Travel for University-related<br />
business should be conducted as economically as possible within the assistant&#8217;s<br />
constraints of time and convenience.</p>
<p>B. Laboratory Equipment<br />
Assistants shall not be expected to pay for laboratory equipment necessary<br />
for the fulfillment of work-related duties. Nor shall assistants be expected<br />
to pay for laboratory equipment that is broken or damaged in the execution<br />
of approved or authorized work-related duties.</p>
<p>C. Immunizations and Certifications<br />
If a department determines that an immunization or certification is required<br />
for an assistant to perform the functions of an appointment, the department<br />
shall pay for such immunization or certification. Nothing in this section is<br />
intended to apply to any immunization or certification required for immigration<br />
purposes, as part of the admissions process, or to obtain a professional license</p>
<p><a name="Information" id="Information"></a>
<p><strong>XII. Distribution of Information </strong><br />
A. The University shall notify all new assistants hired to work in the categories<br />
covered by this contract that the Union is the exclusive representative for<br />
all employees described in Article II. </p>
<p>B. The University will notify the Union of the name, Net I.D., local address<br />
and phone number, department of employment, job classification, appointment<br />
title, percentage assistantship, stipend, office address and telephone number,<br />
and email address in electronic format of all new appointments in the classifications<br />
covered by this contract within five (5) working days after the first pay date<br />
in each semester. An update in the same format shall be given to the Union<br />
on a monthly basis thereafter.</p>
<p>C. The Union shall have the right to utilize campus mail under University policy.</p>
<p>D. The Union shall furnish the University with a full list of elected officers<br />
within five working days of the first payroll. An update on any changes shall<br />
be given to the University on a semester basis thereafter.</p>
<p>E. The Union shall not redisclose an assistant&#8217;s personal information<br />
obtained from the University to any other party without the prior written consent<br />
of the assistant.</p>
<p><a name="Personnel" id="Personnel"></a>
<p><strong>XIII. Personnel Files </strong><br />
A. The University&#8217;s Campus Academic Human Resources Office maintains<br />
the official personnel file for covered assistants. The University may maintain<br />
other official personnel files. </p>
<p>B. Assistants will be permitted to review their official personnel file(s)<br />
pursuant to provisions of the Illinois Employee Access to Records Act (820<br />
ILCS 40/1 et seq.) All files shall be open, accessible, and available for an<br />
assistant&#8217;s review, except for records which are not required to be produced<br />
under this Act, within seven (7) days of such request. If authorized by an<br />
assistant in writing, the Union may also review the official personnel file(s)<br />
pursuant to relevant provisions of this Act. Requests by assistants or their<br />
designated representative for copies of personnel files will be honored at<br />
a cost not to exceed the actual cost of duplication. </p>
<p>C. Neither the files nor any of their contents shall be copied or otherwise<br />
made known to any person outside the University without the assistant&#8217;s<br />
written permission or as otherwise allowed by law. Unless a release of a file<br />
is ordered to a party in a legal action or arbitration, disciplinary reports<br />
or other records of disciplinary action which are more than four (4) years<br />
old shall not be disclosed. </p>
<p>D. Assistants may dispute information in the file(s) and if unable to reach<br />
an agreement with the University on correcting or removing that information,<br />
may submit a statement to be attached to the disputed material as long as it<br />
is part of the file(s).</p>
<p>E. Personnel record information which was not included in the personnel record(s)<br />
but should have been as required by Act shall not be used by the University<br />
in a grievance or arbitration proceeding. However, personnel record information<br />
which, in the opinion of the grievance hearing officer or an arbitrator, was<br />
not intentionally excluded from the personnel record(s) may be used by the<br />
University in the proceeding if the assistant agrees or has been given a reasonable<br />
time to review the information. Material which should have been included in<br />
the personnel record(s) shall be used at the request of the assistant.</p>
<p>F. Records relating to the grievance process, such as appeals, responses, and<br />
settlement documents, shall be maintained separately from the TA or GA personnel<br />
file(s).</p>
<p><a name="Stipends" id="Stipends"></a>
<p><strong>XIV. Stipends </strong><br />
Effective August 16, 2006 through August 15, 2007, assistants will be paid no less than the campus minima for assistants (which is $12,586/year for a 50% appointment on a 9 month service basis).  Also, the minimum percent increase for continuing assistants (who held an assistantship appointment  during 2005-06) will be 3% (three percent) over their 2005-06 stipend rate (based on a 50% 9 month service basis). Pay shall be awarded retroactively for this academic year.<br />
<br />
Effective Year 2 (academic year 2007-2008), assistants will be paid no less than $13,002 or the campus minima for assistants, whichever is greater.  Also, the minimum percent increase for continuing assistants (who held an assistantship appointment during 2006-7) will be 3% (over their 2006-07 stipend rate based on a 50% 9 month service basis), or the campus salary program for non-represented graduate assistants, whichever is greater.  <br />
Effective Year 3 (academic year 2008-2009), assistants will be paid no less than $13,430 or the campus minima for assistants, whichever is greater.  Also the minimum percent increase for continuing assistants (who held an assistantship appointment during 2007-08) will be 2.75 % over their 2007-08 stipend rate (based on a 50% 9 month service basis), or the campus salary program for non-represented graduate assistants, whichever is greater.<br />
Appointments of different duration or percentage shall be figured proportionally.<br />
The parties agree that the assistant&#8217;s appointing unit may pay above<br />
the minimum stipend and minimum percent increment for continuing assistant<br />
appointments, and that this amount may vary from unit to unit.</p>
<p><a name="Health" id="Health"></a>
<p><strong>XV. Health Care </strong><br />
1. All Assistants covered by this agreement are eligible for health care benefits<br />
described below:<br />
a. Coverage through McKinley Health Center and Counseling Center:<br />
Assistants shall have access to the McKinley Health Center and Counseling Center.<br />
The University will pay 100% of the student Health Service fee.<br />
<br />
Assistants may purchase coverage for spouses and same-sex domestic partners<br />
in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations governing such coverage.</p>
<p>b. Health Insurance:<br />
Assistants are eligible for coverage under the University&#8217;s Graduate<br />
Student Health Insurance plan. Assistants must pay their share of the Student<br />
Health Insurance Fee or document that they have other health insurance coverage<br />
equivalent to the University plan. The University will contribute $100 per semester (fall, spring, summer) towards the Student Health Insurance fee for any assistant holding an assistantship who chooses to be covered by the University plan, and the assistant will pay the balance of the cost.  Assistants may purchase coverage for spouses, same-sex domestic partners, and dependants, in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations governing such coverage.  Information about coverage may be obtained from the student insurance office.<br />
Effective August 16, 2007, the University&#8217;s contribution to the Student Health Insurance fee shall increase to $130 per semester (fall, spring, summer) or 50% of the Student Health Insurance Fee (whichever is greater) for any assistant holding an assistantship who chooses to be covered by the University plan, and the assistant will pay the balance of the cost.  <br />
Effective August 16, 2008, the University&#8217;s contribution to the Student Health Insurance fee shall increase to $140 per semester (fall, spring, summer) or 50% of the Student Health Insurance Fee (whichever is greater) for any assistant holding an assistantship who chooses to be covered by the University plan, and the assistant will pay the balance of the cost.<br />
Assistants may purchase coverage for spouses, same-sex domestic partners, and<br />
dependents in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations governing<br />
such coverage.</p>
<p>c. Vision Insurance<br />
Costs of the vision program for assistants will be borne by the University<br />
and will be paid in accordance with the program&#8217;s provisions.<br />
Assistants may purchase vision coverage for spouses, same-sex domestic partners,<br />
and dependents in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations governing<br />
such coverage.</p>
<p>d. Dental Insurance:<br />
Costs of the dental insurance program for assistants will be borne by the University<br />
and will be paid in accordance with the program&#8217;s provisions.<br />
1. Assistants may purchase dental coverage for spouses, same-sex domestic partners,<br />
and dependents in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations governing<br />
such coverage.<br />
2. During the term of this agreement, the University has the sole discretion<br />
to alter the<br />
terms of health coverage including but not limited to coverage, carriers, or<br />
other program provisions so long as such alteration does not conflict with<br />
a provision of this Agreement. If the cost to an assistant to purchase Student<br />
Health Insurance for the assistant increases more than 15% in any given academic<br />
year, then either party may request to reopen negotiations on Section 1b. above<br />
only.<br />
3. The Union shall designate two (2) assistants to meet with University officials<br />
responsible for campus health services at least annually for the purpose of<br />
providing input and recommendations to the University with respect to the University&#8217;s<br />
student health insurance program. The Union and the University are committed<br />
to working to improve health care benefits available to assistants at the University.</p>
<p>
<a name="Dues" id="Dues"></a>
<p><strong>Article XVI. Dues Deduction and Fair Share</strong></p>
<p>Section 16.1. Upon receipt of a written and signed authorization card the Employer<br />
shall deduct the amount of Union dues certified by the Union and/or other authorized<br />
deductions set forth in such card and any authorized increase therein, and<br />
shall remit to the Union at the address designated by the Union. The Union<br />
shall notify the Employer of any increase in dues at least 30 calendar days<br />
before the effective date of the increase.</p>
<p>Section 16.2. Fair Share.<br />
Section 16.2 (a). It is recognized that the negotiation and administration<br />
of this Agreement results in expenses which are appropriately shared by all<br />
employees. To this end, if an employee does not join the Union within thirty<br />
(30) days of commencement of his/her duties, or the effective date of this<br />
Agreement, whichever is later, and the employee does not execute an authorization<br />
for the deduction of Fair Share, the Employer shall deduct the fair share fee<br />
in monthly payments as certified by the Union from the regular salary check<br />
of the employee. Such fee shall be paid to the Union by the Employer no later<br />
than 10 days following deduction, or as soon thereafter as practicable.</p>
<p>Section 16.2 (b). The parties expressly recognize the rights of nonmembers<br />
based upon their bona fide religious tenets or teachings of a church or religious<br />
body as provided for in Section 11 of the Illinois Education Labor Relations<br />
Act.</p>
<p>Section 16.2 (c). In the event of any legal action against the Employer brought<br />
in a court or administrative agency because of its compliance with this Article,<br />
the Union agrees to defend such action, at its own expense and through its<br />
own counsel, provided:<br />
1. The Employer notifies the Union promptly, in writing, and permits the Union<br />
to intervene as a party if it so desires.<br />
2. The Employer gives full and complete cooperation to the Union and its counsel<br />
in securing and giving evidence, obtaining witnesses and making relevant information<br />
available at both trial and all appellate levels.</p>
<p>Section 16.2 (d). The Union shall indemnify and hold harmless the Employer,<br />
its members, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims,<br />
demands, actions, complaints, suits, or other forms of liability that shall<br />
arise out of, or by reason of, action taken by the Employer for the purposes<br />
of complying with the above provisions of this Article, or in reliance of any<br />
list, notice, certification, affidavit, or assignment furnished under any of<br />
such provisions.</p>
<p>Section 16.2 (e). It is expressly understood that this hold harmless provision<br />
will not apply to any claim, demand suit or other form of liability which may<br />
arise as a result of willful misconduct by the Board.</p>
<p><a name="Leaves" id="Leaves"></a>
<p> <strong>XVII. Leaves and Holidays </strong><br />
A. Paid Leaves <br />
Assistantships typically require services on a 9-month or semester-by-semester<br />
basis (&#8220;E&#8221; service), and some assistants will have separate summer<br />
appointments for part or all of the summer. Assistants on a 9-month or semester-by-semester<br />
basis do not earn any vacation.<br />
Assistants who are appointed on a 12-month basis (&#8220;Y&#8221; service)<br />
are eligible for vacations of 24 work days each year at the percentage they<br />
are appointed, with a maximum accumulation of 48 work days at the percentage<br />
of their appointment. Vacation days are earned based on two days of vacation<br />
for each month of service to a maximum accumulation of 48 work days. The scheduling<br />
of vacation time is determined with the supervisor and may include time taken<br />
during semester breaks, at the discretion of the employing department. </p>
<p>B. Sick Leave<br />
Assistants are eligible for 13 noncumulative and noncompensable work days of<br />
sick leave at the percentage of their appointment for each appointment year,<br />
whether they are appointed on a nine-month or a twelve-month basis. Graduate<br />
students appointed to one-semester assistantships earn 6.5 days of sick leave<br />
at the percentage of their appointment. <br />
Assistants must promptly notify the department head or supervisor so that arrangements<br />
for coverage of duties can be made and the usage recorded. Assistants are subject<br />
to University policies (contained in the Campus Administrative Manual) concerning<br />
use of sick leave. </p>
<p>C. Parental Leave.<br />
Eligible assistants are entitled to up to two weeks of parental leave without<br />
loss of pay immediately following the birth of a child, or upon either the<br />
initial placement or the legal adoption of a child under 18 years of age. Eligible<br />
assistants are those who hold an active appointment at the time the parental<br />
leave is taken. The requirement that academic staff members must have six months<br />
of service to receive this benefit does not apply to graduate employees. Parental<br />
leave will be counted as part of the twelve-week entitlement accorded by the<br />
Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) for FMLA-eligible individuals and may be<br />
used in conjunction with other paid or unpaid leaves for which the individual<br />
is eligible.</p>
<p>D. Jury Duty<br />
Assistants are eligible for leave of absence without loss of pay for the duration<br />
of jury duty or for service as a witness in response to a subpoena which is<br />
related to an assistant&#8217;s past or current duties, on the day or days<br />
when the assistants would have otherwise been performing assistant duties.<br />
An assistant may also retain funds paid in compensation for jury duty in keeping<br />
with University policy. <br />
An assistant summoned as a juror or as a subpoenaed witness related to their<br />
past or current University duties shall immediately inform his/her supervisor<br />
of the absence. Teaching assistants who are called for jury duty shall discuss<br />
with their supervisor whether jury service will conflict with their teaching<br />
obligation and if so, whether requesting a deferral from jury duty is appropriate.<br />
An assistant who reports for jury duty and is dismissed shall resume his/her<br />
normal duties as soon as possible.</p>
<p>E. Military Leave <br />
Military leave shall be in accordance with applicable state and federal law,<br />
and University policy. </p>
<p>F. Bereavement Leave.<br />
Assistants are eligible to receive up to three days of paid leave to attend<br />
the funeral, for travel, and bereavement time upon the death of an assistant&#8217;s<br />
immediate family, same-sex domestic partner or household member, in-laws, grandchildren,<br />
and/or grandparents; and one day of paid leave for a relative other than the<br />
above, who is not a member of the assistant&#8217;s household.</p>
<p>G. Coverage Responsibility <br />
If an assistant must be absent from work, it is the assistant&#8217;s responsibility<br />
to follow established departmental policies and procedures. This may include<br />
a responsibility to inform the assistant&#8217;s supervisor in advance of the absence,<br />
to explain to the supervisor the reason for the absence, to secure the supervisor&#8217;s<br />
approval of the absence, and to follow the employing unit&#8217;s policies concerning<br />
arranging for substitutes to perform the assistant&#8217;s duties. </p>
<p>H. Personal Leave of Absence<br />
An assistant may be granted an unpaid leave of absence during the term of his/her<br />
appointment, upon request to and at the sole discretion of the Employer and<br />
subject to such terms and conditions as the Employer may establish.</p>
<p>I. Holidays<br />
Assistants shall receive holidays off without loss of pay in accordance with<br />
the campus holiday schedule, which may be modified from time to time.</p>
<p>J. Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 <br />
In compliance with the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (&#8220;FMLA&#8221;)<br />
and applicable rules and regulations, the University may adopt policies to<br />
implement the FMLA that are in accord with what is legally permissible under<br />
the Act and the applicable rules and regulations.</p>
<p>
<a name="Grievance" id="Grievance"></a> <strong>XVIII. Grievance Procedure </strong><br />
A. Grievance Definition and Applicability <br />
A grievance is a complaint filed by an assistant or group of assistants (grievant(s))<br />
alleging a violation by the University pertaining to the grievant of a specific<br />
provision or provisions of this Agreement.<br />
Every assistant covered by this agreement shall have the right to present grievances<br />
in accordance with these procedures, with or without representation. An officer<br />
of the Union may also file a grievance on behalf of the Union pertaining to<br />
the rights of the Union as specified in this Agreement.<br />
Any individual assistant or group of assistants may at any time present grievances<br />
to the University and have them adjusted without the representation of the<br />
Union as long as the adjustment is not inconsistent with the terms of the collective<br />
bargaining agreement then in effect and provided that the Union has been given<br />
an opportunity to be present at such adjustment.<br />
An assistant who participates in the grievance procedure shall not be subject<br />
to discipline or reprisal because of such participation.<br />
Meetings, conferences and hearings under this procedure shall be conducted<br />
at a time and place which will afford a fair and reasonable opportunity for<br />
all persons, including witnesses to attend and which respects the assistant&#8217;s<br />
coverage responsibility under Article XVII, Section G. <br />
All records of grievances will be kept separate from the official personnel<br />
file maintained by the University&#8217;s campus Academic Human Resources Office.<br />
The time limits specified in this procedure may be extended in any specific<br />
instance by mutual agreement in writing. Any step of the grievance procedure<br />
may be waived by mutual agreement in writing. A request for an extension of<br />
time or waiver of a level within the Grievance Procedure shall be addressed<br />
to the Associate Provost and Director of Academic Human Resources for the University<br />
or to the Grievance Officer of the Union.</p>
<p>B. Time Limits <br />
Failure to file a grievance within thirty (30) calendar days following an occurrence<br />
on which the grievance is based shall constitute a waiver of the grievance.<br />
In calculating calendar days under this grievance procedure, designated campus<br />
holidays will be excluded. Failure to appeal a grievance from one level to<br />
another within the time periods hereafter provided shall constitute a waiver<br />
of the right to appeal a grievance. If the University fails to respond to a<br />
grievance within the applicable time limit, the grievant may appeal the grievance<br />
to the next level. By mutual agreement, the parties may extend in writing any<br />
and all time limits.</p>
<p>C. Adjustment of Grievances <br />
An effort shall first be made to adjust an alleged grievance informally between<br />
the assistant (and his/her union steward, if so desired) and the immediate<br />
supervisor. <br />
1. Level 1. If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussion, the<br />
grievant shall thirty (30) calendar days following an occurrence on which the<br />
grievance is based to file a written grievance with the assistant&#8217;s Unit<br />
Executive Officer or designee. The written grievance must contain the following<br />
information in order to be considered eligible for processing: a specific description<br />
of the dispute, the facts giving rise to the dispute, a listing of the article<br />
and section violated, a statement as to how the article and section were violated,<br />
the date(s) of the violation, and requested remedy. The Unit Executive Officer<br />
(UEO), or designee from within the department, may meet with the grievant (and<br />
his/her Union officer or designee, if so desired) and shall give a written<br />
decision on the grievance to the grievant within fourteen (14) calendar days<br />
after receipt of the written grievance or within fourteen (14) calendar days<br />
of the meeting if one is held, whichever is later.<br />
2. Level 2. In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level 1, the decision<br />
rendered may be appealed to the Dean of the College in which the assistant<br />
is appointed (or Executive Officer to whom the UEO reports), provided such<br />
appeal is made in writing within fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt<br />
of the decision in Level 1. If a grievance has been appealed, the Dean or designee<br />
may meet to discuss the grievance. Within ten (10) calendar days after receipt<br />
of the appeal or within ten (10) calendar days after the meeting, whichever<br />
is later, the Dean or designee shall issue a decision to the Union and the<br />
grievant(s).<br />
3. Level 3. In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level 2, the decision<br />
may be appealed to the Associate Provost and Director of Academic Human Resources,<br />
or designee, provided such appeal is made in writing within fourteen (14) calendar<br />
days after receipt of the decision in Level 2. If a grievance has been appealed<br />
to Level 3, as described above, the Associate Provost or designee may meet<br />
to hear the grievance. Within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of the appeal<br />
or within ten (10) calendar days after the meeting, the Associate Provost or<br />
designee shall issue a decision in writing to the parties involved.</p>
<p>D. Arbitration Procedure<br />
1. Request. The Union may submit a grievance to arbitration provided written<br />
notice of intent to arbitrate is delivered to the office of the Associate Provost<br />
within twenty-one (21) calendar days following receipt of the decision in Level<br />
3 of the grievance procedure. More than one grievance may be submitted to the<br />
same arbitrator if both parties so agree in writing.<br />
2. Selection of Arbitrator. Upon submission of a request for arbitration, the<br />
parties may within ten (10) calendar days after the request to arbitrate, attempt<br />
to agree upon an arbitrator. In the event the parties are unable to agree upon<br />
the arbitrator within said ten (10) calendar day period, the parties shall<br />
jointly request the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Services (FMCS) or American<br />
Arbitration Association (AAA) to submit a panel of five (5) arbitrators, all<br />
of whom are members of the National Academy of Arbitrators. Each party retains<br />
the right to reject one panel in its entirety and request that a new panel<br />
be submitted. Both the University and the Union shall have the right to strike<br />
two (2) names from the panel. The party requesting arbitration shall strike<br />
the first two names; the other party shall then strike two names. The person<br />
remaining shall be the arbitrator. The parties shall promptly notify the arbitrator<br />
of his/her selection. <br />
3. Hearing. The grievance shall be heard by a single arbitrator and both parties<br />
may be represented by such persons as they may designate, and the parties shall<br />
have the right to a hearing at which time both parties will have the opportunity<br />
to submit evidence, offer testimony, and make oral or written arguments relating<br />
to the issues before the arbitrator.<br />
4. Decision. The arbitrator so selected shall confer with the Employer and<br />
Union representatives and hold hearings promptly and shall issue her/his decision<br />
not later than thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the close of the<br />
hearings or, if written briefs have not been waived, then from the date the<br />
final statements and proofs on the issues are submitted to her/him. The arbitrator&#8217;s<br />
decision shall be in writing and shall set forth her/his findings of fact,<br />
reasoning and conclusions on the issues submitted. The arbitrator&#8217;s authority<br />
shall be limited to determining whether the University has violated arbitrable<br />
provisions of this contract. The arbitrator shall not have jurisdiction or<br />
authority to add to, amend, modify, nullify, or ignore in any way the provisions<br />
of this contract nor shall the arbitrator have the authority to review any<br />
academic judgment. To the extent that the University&#8217;s action is based<br />
upon academic judgment, the arbitrator shall have no authority or jurisdiction<br />
to substitute his/her judgment for that of the University and its agents. The<br />
decision of the arbitrator shall be submitted to the parties and, if it is<br />
rendered in accordance with the provisions of this section, shall be final<br />
and binding on the parties.<br />
5. Expenses. The cost for the services of the arbitrator, including per diem<br />
expenses, if any, and actual and necessary travel and subsistence expenses<br />
shall be borne equally by the University and the Union. Any other expenses<br />
incurred shall be paid by the party incurring the same.</p>
<p><a name="Safety" id="Safety"></a><strong>Article XIX. Health and Safety </strong><br />
The University is committed to the safety and well being of its students, staff<br />
and the public it serves. The administration, faculty, and staff have the responsibility<br />
to promote health and safety in their environment and operations and shall<br />
do so in accordance with any and all applicable federal and state laws. This<br />
contract is subject to the University&#8217;s policies on health and safety<br />
enumerated in Section V.(B) Environmental Health and Safety of the Campus Administrative<br />
Manual, as they exist on the effective date of this Agreement, or as amended,<br />
and are incorporated herein by reference.<br />
Assistants shall report any unhealthy or hazardous work condition. The University<br />
shall consult with the appropriate unit of the Division of Environmental Health<br />
and Safety to review the situation, determine whether the work environment<br />
is hazardous, and if so, attempt to resolve the matter.<br />
Upon written request from the Union, the University shall provide a report<br />
of the most recent Division of Environmental Health and Safety inspection for<br />
specified University buildings in accordance with the Illinois Freedom of Information<br />
Act, 5 ILCS 140/1 et seq.</p>
<p>
<a name="Labor" id="Labor"></a>
<p><strong>Article XX. Labor Management Meetings and Consultation </strong><br />
Section 20.1. It is the joint intention of the Union and the Employer to meet<br />
on a regular basis to promote a sound and mutually beneficial relationship.<br />
Section 20.1 (a). The University and the Union shall each designate two members<br />
to meet.<br />
Section 20.1 (b). There shall be at least one (1) meeting each semester. Additional<br />
meetings may be called by mutual agreement. A mutually agreeable place and<br />
time will be established.</p>
<p>
<a name="Scope" id="Scope"></a> <strong>XXI. Scope of the Agreement </strong><br />
The University and the Union acknowledge that during the negotiations which<br />
resulted in this Agreement each had the unlimited right and opportunity to<br />
make demands and proposals with respect to any subject or matter not removed<br />
by law from the area of collective bargaining, and that the understandings<br />
and agreements arrived at by the parties after the exercise of that right and<br />
opportunity are set forth in this Agreement. Therefore, the University and<br />
Union, for the life of this Agreement, each voluntarily waives the right, and<br />
agrees that the other shall not be obligated to bargain collectively with respect<br />
to any subject or matter referred to or covered in this Agreement. <br />
This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the University and the<br />
Union. Any agreement(s) which supplement this Agreement shall not be binding<br />
or effective for any purpose whatsoever unless reduced to writing and signed<br />
by the University and the Union.<br />
No past practice, course of conduct, or understanding prior to the date of<br />
ratification which varies, waives, or modifies any of the express terms or<br />
conditions contained herein shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless<br />
made and executed in writing by the University and the Union.</p>
<p>
<a name="Savings" id="Savings"></a> <strong>XXII. Savings Clause </strong><br />
Should any part or provision of this Agreement be rendered or declared illegal<br />
or invalid by operation of law or by decision of any tribunal of competent<br />
jurisdiction or if compliance with or enforcement of any provision should be<br />
restrained by such tribunal pending a final determination as to its validity,<br />
the remaining part(s) or provision(s) of this Agreement shall not be affected<br />
thereby. In the event any provision herein contained is so rendered invalid,<br />
upon written request the University and the Union shall enter into collective<br />
bargaining for the purpose of negotiating a mutually satisfactory replacement<br />
for such provision. 
</p>
<p><a name="Strike" id="Strike"></a>
<p><strong>XXIII. No Strike </strong><br />
There shall be no strike during the term of this Agreement. Neither the Union,<br />
through its officers or representatives, nor any assistant covered by this<br />
Agreement shall authorize, institute, participate in, aid or condone any<br />
strike, work stoppage, slowdown, or any other concerted action against or<br />
any concerted interference with the operations of the University. Any or<br />
all assistants who violate the provisions of this Article may be subject<br />
to disciplinary action, including dismissal under Article IV, Section I of<br />
this Agreement. Nothing in this paragraph, however, shall be construed to<br />
limit participation of individual assistants in an activity that is unrelated<br />
to their assistantship duties. <br />
If the Union, through its officials, fully performs its obligations as set<br />
forth in this provision, the University agrees that it will not file or initiate<br />
any action for damages against the Union or its officials.</p>
<p><a name="Duration" id="Duration"></a>
<p><strong>XXIV. Duration</strong><br />
A. This Agreement is effective from August 16, 2006 through August 15, 2009. <br />
This Agreement shall be automatically renewed from year to year thereafter<br />
unless either party shall notify the other in writing at least sixty (60) days<br />
prior to the Agreement&#8217;s expiration date that it desires to modify this<br />
Agreement. In the event that such notice is given, negotiations shall be undertaken<br />
without undue delay, in any event, no later than forty-five (45) days of such<br />
written notice.</p>
<p>B. Once the notice called for in Section A above has been given, this Agreement<br />
shall remain in full force and effect indefinitely throughout the negotiations<br />
until a new Agreement has been entered into or until an impasse has been reached<br />
pursuant to procedures of the IELRA.</p>
<p>C. The party giving notice of a desire to modify the contract as provided for<br />
in Section A above shall commence negotiations by submitting a list of modifications<br />
or changes desired. The party receiving said notice may propose additional<br />
changes in the contract.</p>
<p><a name="MOU" id="MOU"></a>
<p><strong>MEMO OF UNDERSTANDING </strong><br />
During the term of the 2006-09 agreement, the G.E.O. and the University shall each select two representatives that will form a committee to monitor test-taking conditions for English language proficiency exams such as the SPEAK. The committee will observe and document test-taking conditions, and work in mutual cooperation to ensure that test-taking conditions allow the assistant to do his or her best work. This committee will meet within two months of ratification of this agreement, and either party may request additional meetings at any time, so long as the requests are not excessive or unreasonable.<br/><br />
The Union agrees to drop its proposals on Article VII: Hours of Work.<br/></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><!-- #EndEditable --></p>
<h2></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uigeo.org/2007/04/05/full-text-of-2006-2009-taga-contract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GEO budget</title>
		<link>http://www.uigeo.org/2006/12/18/geo-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uigeo.org/2006/12/18/geo-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.uigeo.org/2006/12/18/geo-budget/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Explanation of the GEO Budget
<p>
Why do we pay the IFT, AFT, and AFL-CIO?
The GEO is part of the Illinois Federation of Teachers (IFT), the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), and the AFL-CIO. The money we pay to these organizations allows the GEO to utilize resources that are shared by all affiliated local unions. Examples of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Explanation of the GEO Budget</h3>
<p><img align="middle" alt="web budget 06-07.jpg" src="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/web budget 06-07.jpg" width="480" height="327" border="0" /><br />
<b>Why do we pay the IFT, AFT, and AFL-CIO?</b><br />
The GEO is part of the Illinois Federation of Teachers (IFT), the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), and the AFL-CIO. The money we pay to these organizations allows the GEO to utilize resources that are shared by all affiliated local unions. Examples of how our affiliates have helped include:</p>
<ul>
<li> Bargaining support: We have an IFT negotiations expert at every bargaining session with the UI administration. S/he helps train our bargaining team and provides valuable insight during the process.</li>
<li> National Influence: Through the AFT, graduate unions are working with a coalition of other organizations to defend academic freedom and to promote shared governance on campuses across the country. </li>
<li> Legal: The GEO has repeatedly used the IFT legal counsel to secure collective bargaining rights. Furthermore, IFT has filed unfair labor practices with the Labor Board on GEO&#8217;s behalf.</li>
<li> Legal / Contract Enforcement: GEO has a legal obligation to represent all employees in grievances regardless of their membership status. All employees in the bargaining unit can file grievances, some of which may be heard in third party arbitration. Arbitration is an expensive process but it is a step we need to be prepared to take when necessary. As a member of the IFT Local Legal Trust, our arbitration costs are fully funded.</li>
<li> Lobbying: The IFT helped to pass a bill through the state legislature to ensure collective bargaining rights for grad employees at public institutions in Illinois. The state AFL-CIO helped change state law to allow the spouse or dependent of international students/employees to obtain drivers licenses. This directly affects a number of GEO members.</li>
<li> Recognition fight: The IFT supported the GEO through its decade-long struggle to unionize this campus. They provided us with vital financial, legal, and political resources. The IFT paid all legal fees when the GEO took its recognition suit to the Illinois State Supreme Court! The local AFL-CIO helped organize religious leaders in the community to pressure the UI to allow grad employees to choose union representation.</li>
<li> Education: The AFT finances 2 conferences per year where grad unionists can come together and share bargaining and organizing resources.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Local Budget</b><br />
There are many aspects to a thriving union. It is critical that we have the following:</p>
<ul>
<li> A qualified permanent staff that can help coordinate membership drives, keep in touch with stewards, help employees with grievances, and generally coordinate GEO activists.</li>
<li> Contingency Fund: The GEO sets aside funds that may be required to handle unforeseen circumstances. A dispute with the University that led to a strike might bankrupt the GEO unless we keep money ready to meet the challenge. </li>
<li> Organizing: A successful union must have a strong and active membership. The GEO is well known for its fun events, but these events are not just about having fun. They serve as important avenues for increasing our membership and getting out our message.</li>
<li> Office: These funds provide for the day-to-day operations of the GEO. The GEO pays rent for offices in the University YMCA. In addition, there are the regular expenses of maintaining an office: phone lines, copy toner, Internet service, etc.</li>
<li> Contract Bargaining: Clearly, bargaining is a central part of this year?s activities. Training and consulting specific to bargaining as well as materials needed for contract ratification will be covered with these funds.</li>
<li> Training: Maintaining a dynamic and effective union requires leadership training as well as instruction on the specific tasks such as grievance handling, financial management and coalition-building.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uigeo.org/2006/12/18/geo-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>in the news</title>
		<link>http://www.uigeo.org/2006/12/15/in-the-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uigeo.org/2006/12/15/in-the-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[current issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.uigeo.org/2006/12/15/in-the-news/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The News-Gazette
Graduate employees hold rally for higher pay
Published Online Dec 7, 2006
By Christine Des Garennes
With temperatures hovering around freezing and less than a week to go before final exams begin, University of Illinois graduate employees took a break from studying and grading Wednesday to rally on campus for higher pay.
The Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The News-Gazette</b><br />
<b>Graduate employees hold rally for higher pay</b><br />
Published Online Dec 7, 2006<br />
By Christine Des Garennes<br />
With temperatures hovering around freezing and less than a week to go before final exams begin, University of Illinois graduate employees took a break from studying and grading Wednesday to rally on campus for higher pay.<br />
The Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization and the UI have been negotiating for a new contract since April. Several rallies and more than a dozen bargain sessions later, the two sides are still in discussions. Recently, tensions rose between the UI and the union when they started negotiating wages.<br />
The current minimum graduate stipend  the salary a graduate student earns as a research assistant or teaching assistant  is $12,220. That salary is for a 50-percent time, nine-month appointment. That stipend can be higher depending on the student&#8217;s appointment. About one in five graduate employees earns the minimum stipend, said UI spokeswoman Robin Kaler.<br />
Under the current UI proposal, the stipend would rise by 2.5 percent to $12,586 for 2006-2007. For 2007-2008, assistants would make a minimum of $12,963 and in 2008-2009 the minimum would increase to $13,354.<br />
But that&#8217;s not enough to cover the rising costs of living for a student, said union members.<br />
The stipend &#8220;is the primary source of income for students,&#8221; said Christopher Simeone, graduate student and negotiator for the union. &#8220;Our own minimum stipend doesn&#8217;t meet the published figures (by the UI&#8217;s Office of Admissions and Records) for what it takes to live in Champaign-Urbana,&#8221; Simeone said.<br />
According to that office&#8217;s Web site, graduate student expenses average close to $14,000 a year in Champaign-Urbana for room, board and other living expenses.<br />
Also at issue are health care costs and the other student fees the graduate employees pay the university.<br />
&#8220;Fees eat a significant portion of the stipend,&#8221; said William Hope, graduate employee and union member.<br />
The health care premium for a graduate employee is $256 per semester or $756 a year. But add a spouse and children to the plan, and graduate employees could spend more than $1,000 per semester for health coverage.<br />
&#8220;For some students it&#8217;s more cost effective to fly back to their home country to receive care there, and that includes the cost of airfare,&#8221; Simeone said.<br />
Completely waiving the health fees is &#8220;not doable because it&#8217;s very expensive to do. We&#8217;ve waived many fees  vision, dental fees, the McKinley Health Center fee,&#8221; Kaler said.<br />
The UI currently covers $100 per semester of the student health care fee. In the current proposal to the union, the UI would increase that amount to $130 per semester beginning Aug. 16, 2007. And it would increase up to $140 per semester in 2008.<br />
The next bargaining session is scheduled for Dec. 13.<br />
&#8220;We have an outstanding offer and have been waiting four weeks for a response. We&#8217;re hoping for a response at that meeting,&#8221; Kaler said of Dec. 13.<br />
If there is no settlement soon, the two sides can request federal mediation.<br />
The union&#8217;s contract expired at the end of August.<br />
<b>Grad workers, officials begin contract talks</b><br />
Published Online Apr 27, 2006<br />
By Christine Des Garennes<br />
URBANA  After he turned 25, David Morris had to strike out on his own to find health insurance.<br />
No longer covered under his father&#8217;s health care plan, the University of Illinois graduate student turned to the UI for coverage.<br />
Keeping himself healthy hasn&#8217;t come cheap.<br />
Morris, now 26, spent about $3,600 last year on unreimbursable medical expenses, most of which were associated with treating his diabetes.<br />
That&#8217;s about 20 percent of his annual income from working as a graduate teaching assistant.<br />
And then there are the student fees and health insurance fees to contend with.<br />
Money&#8217;s tight.<br />
Health care &#8220;is a very important issue for many, many graduate employees,&#8221; Morris said.<br />
With the rising cost of health care and student fees on their minds, members of the UI&#8217;s Graduate Employees&#8217; Union started negotiations with university administration this week.<br />
Their aim: to assemble a new contract they hope will lower student fees and provide for better health care.<br />
The negotiations come at a time when the university has increased tuition for undergraduate and graduate students and created a new $250 per semester fee to cover maintenance on its buildings. The UI is expected to receive a 1.4 percent increase in state funding from last year.<br />
&#8220;We&#8217;re hoping to come up with the best package we can, within the constraints of what we can afford to do,&#8221; said UI spokeswoman Robin Kaler.<br />
&#8220;The big concern for me is (health insurance) cost,&#8221; said Patrick Berry, a graduate student in English. Berry, who has a wife and a 6-year-old daughter, pays about $4,000 a year for health insurance through the UI.<br />
&#8220;When you&#8217;re a graduate student and funded on a stipend, that&#8217;s a big chunk of your income,&#8221; he said.<br />
The current union contract, which was finalized in July 2004 (but retroactive to 2003), will expire in August. It included a 9 percent cost-of-living increase over the course of the contract, about 3 percent each year; a full waiver of the McKinley Health Center fee; and a $100 per semester subsidy of the Student Health Insurance fee. The McKinley Health Center fee is not part of the Student Health Insurance Plan fee.<br />
Current health insurance fees for graduate students are $230 per semester for a student and $940 for a spouse. Coverage for children is $454 per semester, no matter how many children. The summer session is considered a semester.<br />
&#8220;We want to make sure graduate students don&#8217;t have to choose between paying fees, which are a substantial part of your income, and buying some groceries,&#8221; said Michael Simeone, a UI graduate student and union member.<br />
The first meeting between the union and the UI was on Tuesday, and the next is scheduled for May 19, Kaler said.<br />
The negotiating team expects to meet every few weeks, for as long as it takes to come to an agreement.<br />
The contract covers about 2,700 graduate employees.<br />
<b>The Daily Illini</b><br />
<b>LETTER: Financial issues with graduate students</b><br />
Posted: 12/11/06<br />
While the University&#8217;s president resolves to make Illinois the best public university in the nation, the University&#8217;s negotiating team proposes a contract for graduate employees that will make top quality graduate students think twice about coming to a university that offers them so little. While the University&#8217;s administrators take pride in the school&#8217;s excellent reputation for research and teaching, they ask the graduate students who contribute to the school&#8217;s reputation to accept a contract that will reduce their real wages each year, not match rising fees and leave hundreds of graduate students paying significantly more money than they make each year.<br />
It is time for University administrators to recognize the growing divide between their rhetoric and reality. According to the University&#8217;s own statistics, the cost of living for graduate students is almost $1000 more than the minimum stipend for graduate employees. The University&#8217;s current proposal to graduate employees offers wage increases that will not keep up with inflation, insuring that each year graduate students will have to pay even more of their own money.<br />
The University&#8217;s lead negotiator Steve Veazie has said that graduate students have &#8220;a pretty good deal&#8221; because they get a tuition waiver and a minimum $12,500 stipend. But this &#8220;pretty good deal&#8221; is not competitive with peer institutions. Steve Veazie might think paying hundreds of dollars more than you make each semester is a pretty good deal, but top quality graduate students won&#8217;t. Quite simply, Illinois cannot maintain its status, let alone strive for something higher, if it cannot attract top quality graduate students. Veazie has suggested that the University cannot afford to pay graduate students better. In reality, the University cannot afford to make graduate students accept a regressive contract.<br />
Sarah Frohardt-Lane<br />
Graduate Student<br />
© Copyright 2006 The Daily Illini<br />
<b>Graduate employees, University continue to negotiate earnings</b><br />
DRAKE BAER<br />
Posted: 11/29/06<br />
The University and the Graduate Employees Organization are in continuing negotiations over the issues of earnings and insurance for teaching assistants and graduate students.<br />
Steve Veazie, the University attorney involved with the negotiations, said that the University would like to make clear a number of ambiguities over GEO negotiations and the contracts that have been proposed.<br />
He said that the remaining issues to be resolved are also perhaps the most important. The proposal made by the University was a three-year contract with increases to stipends in each of three years and changes made to the insurance plan.<br />
The proposed graduate employee minimum salary rate for teaching assistants and graduate assistants, on average, was a $12,586 annualized salary or a 2.5 percent increase, whichever is greater, each year. The amount that graduate employees are paid varies for each department, with some, such as engineering, giving greater pay. He said that about 25 percent of the teaching assistants are paid at the minimum level.<br />
&#8220;Graduate students are also getting a fee waiver, $12,500 added to the tuition fee waiver. It&#8217;s a pretty good deal,&#8221; Veazie said.<br />
Others seem to disagree.<br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s important to remember that a tuition waiver is not wages. A labor agreement includes wages, and tuition waivers are not included in our discussions about wages,&#8221; said Christopher Simeone, head spokesman for the GEO.<br />
He also said that one would not want to be paid for one&#8217;s eligibility to be an employee and that if there was no tuition waiver, then a graduate student would have to pay simply to work at the University.<br />
&#8220;The GEO is ignoring the fact that we&#8217;re putting substantial money on the line when we&#8217;re proposing a 2.5 percent increase for 2,800 assistants and about the same number of research assistants,&#8221; Veazie said.<br />
Veazie said that one of the main reasons for difficulty in forging the contract comes from the fact that there are so many departments in the University, and each one has done something different.<br />
&#8220;The University&#8217;s proposal is about $1.2 million, which is about the top administrators&#8217; salaries added together,&#8221; Simeone said.<br />
Brian Dolber, graduate student, said that the University has come across &#8220;as a completely disrespectful institution that doesn&#8217;t care about students or employees but only care about their bottom line.&#8221;<br />
The GEO is not ignoring what the University has put on the table, but they are keeping things in &#8220;financial perspective,&#8221; Simeone added.<br />
Departments are competing to attract the best students from California, Michigan and Wisconsin. The University is doing its best to bring in people at a competitive rate, Veazie said.<br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s a sort of matrix of things,&#8221; said Veazie, referring to the complexities in the contract creation process.<br />
The GEO is generally disappointed with the proposal, as it doesn&#8217;t meet the graduate students&#8217; needs, Simeone said.<br />
&#8220;We don&#8217;t want to talk about any wage deduction as a raise until it is a raise over the cost of inflation. Any raise under the rate of 3.6 percent isn&#8217;t really a raise,&#8221; Simeone said.<br />
However, Veazie said that the inflation rate is not guaranteed to any University employee.<br />
&#8220;There is no policy or practice to pay commensurate with inflation,&#8221; he said. &#8220;The cost of living is there, but there&#8217;s also the state budget, which has been pretty stagnant over the past three or four years.&#8221;<br />
Veazie said that before his last meeting with the GEO, which was held on Nov. 14, the University was ready to &#8220;stay as long as it took to get things settled.&#8221; The GEO was unable to give any response that day and did not wish to meet for another four weeks.<br />
The University would be willing to meet before then, he added.<br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s very important at this stage of negotiations that the union respond directly to us, but instead they characterized our offer in the press,&#8221; Veazie said.<br />
Simeone said that the union has been responding to the University throughout the process but that the public also has a right to know about the process.<br />
&#8220;We&#8217;re not ashamed of anything that we&#8217;re doing at the bargaining table, and therefore we don&#8217;t have any problems talking about the bargaining process with the public,&#8221; he said.<br />
&#8220;We think our offer is very fair given the context of state budget constraints and other employees,&#8221; Veazie said.<br />
Veazie said that the University is ready to settle on a fair contract for graduate students and that they are frustrated by the delay, referring to the four-week break between meetings.<br />
The University&#8217;s negotiating team has &#8220;repeatedly stalled and delayed&#8221; in regard to issues such as health care and wages, Dolber said.<br />
This is not the absolute final configuration of the contract, but it&#8217;s close to that, Veazie said. He said that if the union wants &#8220;a lot more,&#8221; then the next step would be mediation.<br />
&#8220;The next step for both parties is to listen. We&#8217;re happy that the University wants to settle sooner rather than later, but we won&#8217;t settle for anything that&#8217;s unfair,&#8221; Simeone said.<br />
The next meeting will be held Dec. 13.<br />
© Copyright 2006 The Daily Illini<br />
<b>Grad employees remain unsatisfied with contract</b><br />
Wage increases deemed &#8216;disrespectful&#8217;<br />
Drake Baer<br />
Posted: 11/15/06<br />
The University and the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization met in a bargaining session Tuesday in order to continue negotiations over a new contract. According to the GEO, the University&#8217;s new offer includes a 2.5 percent wage increase and a $15 increase to health care provisions.<br />
Brian Dolber, communications officer with the GEO and graduate student in the Institute of Communications Research, said the economic package is &#8220;completely insufficient.&#8221; He said that the contract offered is &#8220;another sign of disrespect that they&#8217;ve shown grad employees.&#8221;<br />
Dolber said the health care plan offered is &#8220;the same plan with $15 extra; they essentially offered us three espressos.&#8221;<br />
The University has come across as a &#8220;completely disrespectful institution that doesn&#8217;t care about students or employees, but only cares about their bottom line,&#8221; Dolber continued.<br />
Robin Kaler, University spokesperson, said that the University is trying to provide the best package possible to the Graduate Employees.<br />
&#8220;I think that the University has great respect for grad students,&#8221; Kaler said. &#8220;I think we have some of the greatest grad students in the world and all our students are of our highest priority.&#8221;<br />
The GEO expects a wage with which graduate employees will be able to live comfortably. The proposal offered does not include a living wage by the University&#8217;s standard, Dolber said.<br />
Andrew Kennis, graduate student in Communications, citing the 3.7 percent increase in cost of living adjustment in Champaign-Urbana, said &#8220;while the administration maintains that it&#8217;s a raise, in reality it&#8217;s not keeping up with the cost of living, and so it is actually a pay cut.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;This is especially painful in light of the fact that dependency on (teaching assistants) for the overall teaching load has been increasing for a long time,&#8221; Kennis said.<br />
Christopher Simeone, lead negotiator for the GEO and graduate student in the English Department, said the terms that the University has offered are not acceptable.<br />
Kaler said that the University is working within its means.<br />
&#8220;If you look at the packages offered with any other employee group, we&#8217;re trying to do the best we can with the resources we have available,&#8221; she said.<br />
Simeone said that if the University wants to be competitive in attracting the best developing scholars, it must also be competitive with peer institutions in regards to graduate employees&#8217; wages and benefits.<br />
&#8220;The progress is that the University is trying to push for a settlement sooner rather than later,&#8221; he said.<br />
There has not been enough movement by the University toward the GEO&#8217;s proposals, Simeone said. He said that while some movement is good, it has not been enough to come to an agreement.<br />
The University must make concessions on key issues if a settlement is to be reached, he said.<br />
&#8220;We can&#8217;t accept proposals that are regressive,&#8221; Simeone said.<br />
The GEO&#8217;s proposal would be affordable if the graduate employees were properly prioritized, he said. The message that the GEO is receiving is that they&#8217;re not a priority, he added.<br />
The University is doing its best to provide the best package given its resources, Kaler said.<br />
&#8220;We&#8217;ve been at this since April 25, and we&#8217;re going to make sure that we get something that&#8217;s to our satisfaction and to our members&#8217; satisfaction,&#8221; Simeone said.<br />
The University has recognized the critical role of graduate students from day one, Kaler said.<br />
Simeone said the next bargaining session will be December 13 at 1:00 PM.<br />
Kaler said that if the GEO would have proposed an earlier meeting, the University would have been ready to do so.<br />
© Copyright 2006 The Daily Illini<br />
<b>LETTER: Grad students call for real increase</b><br />
Posted: 11/17/06<br />
At the Nov. 9 Board of Trustees meeting, the University&#8217;s top administrators laid out their goal to make the University of Illinois the best public university in the country. On Nov. 14, the University&#8217;s bargaining team offered graduate students a regressive contract in which graduate students&#8217; salaries would not keep up with inflation. The University&#8217;s goal and its actions in negotiations are fundamentally incompatible.<br />
As President White announced at the Board of Trustees meeting, in order for the University to become the top public university in the country, it must prioritize retaining and hiring the best possible faculty. No such plans exist for attracting and retaining top quality graduate students.<br />
The proposal that the University&#8217;s negotiators offered to the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization (GEO) on Tuesday calls for a wage &#8220;increase&#8221; that, again, will not even keep up with inflation. If the GEO were to accept this contract, TAs and GAs would make less money every year of their contract when cost of living increases are factored in.<br />
If the University is serious about its desire to be the best public university, it must offer competitive wages to graduate employees, as well as faculty. The quality of education that the University of Illinois provides undergraduate students is closely linked to the caliber of its graduate students. It is in the best interest of all of us &#8211; graduate students, undergraduate students, faculty and everyone affiliated with the University &#8211; for the University to negotiate a fair contract for its valuable graduate employees.<br />
Now is the time for all of us to show our support for the GEO in their efforts to establish a fair contract, a contract that will work toward the University&#8217;s goal to be the best public university in the nation, not against it.<br />
History Graduate Students&#8217; Association (HGSA)<br />
© Copyright 2006 The Daily Illini<br />
<b>Adjuncts forgotten amidst grad student negotiations</b><br />
Drake Baer<br />
Posted: 11/3/06<br />
There have been ongoing negotiations between the University and graduate employees in an effort to come up with a fair and equitable contract for both sides. The graduate employees are organized and have made their presence known through demonstrations all over campus. However, another group of academic professionals has not received that recognition &#8211; adjunct faculty members.<br />
The benefits, pay, and working conditions vary greatly amongst different members of University faculty because not every instructor at the University is full time. Adjunct faculty do not have the guaranteed work that their full-time colleagues receive.<br />
&#8220;Most faculty in the majority of post-secondary classrooms are adjuncts,&#8221; said Joe Berry, non-tenure track instructor at the University of Illinois in the Chicago Labor Education Program Extension, part-time instructor at Roosevelt University, and author of &#8220;Reclaiming the Ivory Tower: Organizing Adjuncts to Change Higher Education.&#8221;<br />
Berry said that there are no set time commitments for adjunct faculty.<br />
&#8220;The situation varies from whole year, multi-year, to (contracts that are) per course and per hour, really the academic equivalent of day labor,&#8221; he said.<br />
At the University there is yet to be an adjunct labor movement that has &#8220;gotten off the ground,&#8221; Berry said.<br />
Many adjuncts have more than one teaching job at a time, and most work for multiple institutes, especially in major metropolitan areas such as Chicago, Berry said. University of Illinois-Chicago has 1,112 part-time faculty members, whereas the Urbana campus has 850 part-time faculty, according to the Illinois Board of Higher Education.<br />
&#8220;Our teaching conditions are the students&#8217; learning conditions,&#8221; Berry said.<br />
He said that if adjuncts don&#8217;t have security of employment they cannot help but have a lack of preparation. He also said that the mercurial nature of adjunct life &#8220;eliminates the possibility of informal contact&#8221; on which undergraduate education depends.<br />
Adjunct professors generally teach entry level courses, 100 to 200 level courses, said Tobias Higbie, assistant professor in the University&#8217;s Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations.<br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s very enrollment sensitive,&#8221; Higbie said.<br />
If a class has fewer students than expected, a professor would lose out on the opportunity, he added.<br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s piecing together your living (as a teacher),&#8221; Higbie said.<br />
He said that an adjunct will earn from $600 to $1200 a course at an average institution (but significantly higher at the University).<br />
&#8220;You can&#8217;t live on that,&#8221; Higbie said.<br />
He said that in many cases a single adjunct will work for the same university over a series of years, and potentially stay with one university for many years. He said that this results in adjunct faculty that work for a university as much as full-time professors, but don&#8217;t get near the benefits or security of a full-time professor. He said that when this happens, the adjuncts can become &#8220;second-class citizens&#8221; in an institution.<br />
&#8220;How long can you carry on the University&#8217;s principles when you&#8217;re exploiting certain sections of your workforce?&#8221; Higbie asked.<br />
Higbie said that the University should be a &#8220;model employer,&#8221; and not simply follow what corporations are doing.<br />
© Copyright 2006 The Daily Illini<br />
<b>University, graduate employees continue talks</b><br />
Two parties still in negotiations for wages, benefits<br />
Drake Baer<br />
Posted: 10/27/06<br />
After months of deliberation, the University and the Graduate Employee Organization are continuing negotiations over wages and benefits. On Oct. 16 they came to an agreement over professional evaluation for teaching assistants.<br />
However, there has been little progress on the major issues of pay and other contentious matters, according to Christopher Simeone, lead negotiator of the GEO. He said that the GEO is awaiting the University&#8217;s agreement to additional bargaining dates.<br />
Frank T. Higbie, assistant professor of history at the Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations, said that he has been involved with the GEO since his days as a doctoral student in the mid-1990s.<br />
He said that much of the consternation and unwillingness of the University to recognize the union came from an unclear clause in state law as to whether or not graduate employees can organize. The University&#8217;s reading was that students cannot organize as a union, while the union&#8217;s position was that employees have the right to unionize, Higbie said.<br />
&#8220;There is a misconception that workers stay in one place,&#8221; Higbie said, in regard to the charge that graduate employees shouldn&#8217;t organize because they are only at the University for a fixed period of time.<br />
He said that denying workers the right to organize due to working for a limited amount of time is illogical.<br />
&#8220;People are working for shorter and shorter periods of time at a single workplace,&#8221; Higbie said. &#8220;I worked at my first job after graduating for five years before coming back to the University and worked here for 10 years as a graduate employee.&#8221;<br />
He said the issue comes down to whether or not workers have a right to organize and that the question of a limited term of employment is a &#8220;red herring.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;What are they afraid of?&#8221; asked Higbie. &#8220;That the grad assistants are going to tear down the University?&#8221;<br />
Higbie said graduate employee unions are at nearly all of the University&#8217;s peer institutions.<br />
The University of Michigan and the University of Wisconsin have been &#8220;unionized for decades,&#8221; and the University of California has been unionized for nearly a decade, said Higbie.<br />
&#8220;The GEO fought for and won improvements in pay, dental insurance, eye-care insurance and other things,&#8221; Higbie said. &#8220;The University gave us nothing. They resisted every step of the way, and apparently they are still resisting today.&#8221;<br />
Cary Nelson, English professor and president of the American Association of University Professors, said that the union has provided a few areas of concern to the University, such as asking it to inform international graduate students of the American 911 system.<br />
Nelson said that when the union asked the University to inform the international graduate students of the 911 system, the University declined on the grounds that &#8220;they would not have the union micromanage their affairs.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Like many corporate entities, the University is not bargaining in good faith,&#8221; said Nelson. &#8220;Their primary aims are to pay grad students as little as possible, to exhaust union leadership and to decrease students&#8217; faith in the union&#8230;I call that bargaining in bad faith.&#8221;<br />
Nelson said that the University should be interested in doing the best for their students and not &#8220;simply extracting their labor for the lowest possible cost.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;We are working very hard to try to make progress, and we will continue to do that,&#8221; said Robin Kaler, University spokeswoman. &#8220;We are willing and ready to work with the union to try to create a contract.&#8221;<br />
Graduate students enrich campus, said Kaler, and the University is happy to have them. She said that the University hopes that the experience of the graduate students&#8217; is the best that it can be.<br />
Other University officials contacted declined to comment.<br />
© Copyright 2006 The Daily Illini<br />
<b>Graduate employees plan Union picket</b><br />
Drake Baer<br />
Posted: 10/13/06<br />
Since late April, the Graduate Employees Organization has been in negotiations with the University over a new contract, but no agreements have been made. In the past few months, the union has picketed at Grainger Library, the Illini Union and other locations across campus.<br />
Today they plan to picket at the Illini Union again.<br />
Union members have said that they are displeased with the state of health care and other benefits offered by the University and are in intense negotiations with the University.<br />
&#8220;It cost me $1,800 to get a root canal,&#8221; said Rachel Shulman, graduate student and employee. &#8220;That&#8217;s more than a month&#8217;s salary for me. I had to take out a student loan. And that&#8217;s always their answer: &#8216;Take out a student loan.&#8217;&#8221;<br />
The poor wages and benefits offered by the University are not &#8220;financially commensurate with our responsibilities&#8221; as teaching assistants and graduate employees, Shulman said.<br />
Robin Kaler, University spokeswoman, said the University is giving all it can to graduate students.<br />
&#8220;We are always doing what we can to provide the best package possible with the resources we have available,&#8221; she said.<br />
Schulman, though, said that graduate students work too hard for too few benefits.<br />
&#8220;We&#8217;re the ones who make contact with the students, and not the professors, so informally a lot of the work falls on us,&#8221; she said. &#8220;When you become an instructor, there&#8217;s a whole slew of responsibilities beyond grading papers and tests.&#8221;<br />
Shulman said that she also writes letters of recommendation and deals with issues of plagiarism.<br />
She said that while she welcomes these additional responsibilities, the pay she earns does not properly correspond to the time she invests. Undergraduate education suffers due to the University&#8217;s treatment of graduate employee instructors, she added.<br />
She said that the graduate employees have fought very hard for the right to organize, but it is the union that will fight for greater benefits.<br />
&#8220;What we&#8217;ve experienced is a basic unwillingness to cooperate from the University,&#8221; said Christopher Simeone, graduate student and lead negotiator for the Graduate Employees Organization. &#8220;The University is not interested in genuine rational dialogue. They are interested in dragging it out as long as possible.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I would best describe the University&#8217;s approach as incredibly disappointing and unproductive. It&#8217;s not exaggerating to say that they have (historically) been dragged to the bargaining table,&#8221; he said.<br />
David Morris, a graduate employee and former co-president of the Graduate Employees Organization, also said that the graduate employee health plan is similar to the undergraduate health plan but with some minor changes.<br />
&#8220;We provide a professional service. We want professional treatment,&#8221; Morris said.<br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s student insurance, not employee insurance,&#8221; Morris said. &#8220;The University assumes that many grad students are provided for by their parents, but that&#8217;s simply not the truth. Grad employees have partners and children.&#8221;<br />
Simeone said that he is concerned with how the University is marketing itself toward prospective academics.<br />
&#8220;What they&#8217;re telling developing scholars is that you&#8217;ll be impoverished and disrespected,&#8221; Simeone said. He added that if the University desires to raise its prestige, it must treat its students and employees well.<br />
&#8220;We are not asking for a handout but instead fair compensation for the work we do,&#8221; Simeone said.<br />
Graduate employees, he said, don&#8217;t desire luxuries but income competitive with the cost of living, studying and teaching at the University.<br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s a sinister rhetorical trick to turn a request for compensation into a whiney plea for handouts,&#8221; Morris said.<br />
Simeone said that the University should also supply graduate employees with the resources that they need, such as guaranteed access to an office.<br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s a good thing that we don&#8217;t treat our jobs the way that they treat our jobs,&#8221; Simeone said.<br />
© Copyright 2006 The Daily Illini<br />
<b>University, unions talk to iron out to iron out</b><br />
Meghan O&#8217;Kelly<br />
Posted: 9/6/06<br />
Poster-wielding University employees crowded the corner of Wright and Green streets last Wednesday, coming together in an effort to call attention to their expired labor contracts.<br />
The Graduate Employees Organization (GEO) and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 698 are currently in talks with the University to iron out details for new agreements.<br />
The GEO began negotiating its labor contract with the University April 25. The old contract had expired Aug. 15. The graduate employees are asking for an enhanced health-care plan that includes affordable care for their spouses, dependants and children. GEO Co-president Andrew Ó Baoill said the organization plans to discuss the specifics of the health-care components of the contract at its Sept. 13 meeting with the University.<br />
&#8220;We&#8217;re looking to implement the health-care plan to be more suitable and better meet the needs of graduate students,&#8221; he said. He described the current plan as &#8220;run-of-the-mill preventative care&#8221; that better serves the needs of undergraduates than graduate students.<br />
According to Ó Baoill, the University&#8217;s health-care plan for graduate employees is not on par with peer schools identified in the University&#8217;s 2006 strategic plan. At the University of Michigan, University of California-Berkeley and UCLA, graduate employees do not pay for basic health insurance. The same coverage at the University of Wisconsin-Madison is $99 annually.<br />
By contrast, the campus GEO members are protesting the $260 annual fee for basic health insurance, which has improved since the GEO gained a $100-per-semester subsidy in its last contract.<br />
Although the AFSCME contract, which expired in the fall of 2005, is stalled on issues concerning fair pay, Chris Simeone, lead negotiator for the GEO, said collaborating with groups who have similar interests is an effective way to bring attention to important issues and achieve its goals.<br />
&#8220;We&#8217;re interested in a lot of the same kinds of issues and have a lot of the same concerns as these other unions, especially fair pay and benefits,&#8221; Simeone said, noting that the University has implemented a pay freeze on teaching assistants until an agreement is reached. &#8220;It&#8217;s not a secret that the University likes to use stall tactics and slow things down when it comes to negotiations.&#8221;<br />
University spokesperson Robin Kaler said she hopes both unions can come to resolutions soon but appreciates union laborers voicing their opinions.<br />
&#8220;A university is a marketplace of ideas, and I think we would be a little disappointed if we had students and employees who didn&#8217;t express their feelings,&#8221; she said.<br />
The AFSCME Local 698 is further along in contract negotiations. A meeting between the union, the University and a federal mediator on Thursday moved things forward, Union Vice President Margaret Lewis said. However, she added, issues that have been holding up negotiations remain unsolved.<br />
&#8220;There has been some movement on both sides since we started this,&#8221; she said. &#8220;However, I still don&#8217;t believe we&#8217;re where we need to be.&#8221;<br />
The AFSCME Local 698 is asking for a 3-percent raise to keep up with inflation.<br />
Lewis said the University is offering a raise equal to that of academic professionals and other employees&#8217; pay minus 1.5 percent.<br />
&#8220;If we let something like this into our contract, we&#8217;ll never get a raise of more than 1 percent or 1.5 percent a year,&#8221; Lewis said. &#8220;We are adamant that we can&#8217;t let this into our contract.&#8221;<br />
Kaler said she is confident that an agreement can be reached with both sides working together.<br />
&#8220;We feel that we&#8217;re continuing to make steady progress,&#8221; she said. &#8220;We&#8217;re working very hard to get what we can, and we hope the unions will continue to work with us to do the best we can with the resources we have available.&#8221;<br />
With another meeting scheduled for Oct. 3, Lewis hopes that negotiations come to a timely resolution to avoid the possibility of a strike. Right now, she said, the executive board of the negotiating committee is not ready to present an offer to union members.<br />
&#8220;We&#8217;ve never been in this position,&#8221; she said. &#8220;We&#8217;re getting close to the end, and we need to get someplace on our next negotiation session.&#8221;<br />
As members of both unions continue to work without new contracts, they are striving to gain support for their causes.<br />
&#8220;When we look at what the administration is willing to give themselves versus what they are willing to give front-line workers, something is seriously wrong,&#8221; Lewis said.<br />
© Copyright 2006 The Daily Illini<br />
<b>LETTER: The purpose of unions</b><br />
Martha Althea Webber<br />
Posted: 9/1/06<br />
In John Bambenek&#8217;s column &#8220;Unions: A Relics of the past, taxpayer frustration&#8221; Bambenek makes several value judgments about what is &#8220;not a bad wage&#8221; for teaching assistants and how &#8220;difficult&#8221; or &#8220;hard&#8221; living should be expected while one is a graduate employee, since it is not &#8220;impossible&#8221; to live.<br />
Acting much like large employers, Bambenek forgets a fundamental purpose for the existence of labor unions: it is not for one person &#8211; like John &#8211; or one side of labor &#8211; like the University &#8211; to determine the value of labor or what conditions and benefits employees can live on, either comfortably or difficultly. Labor unions like the Graduate Employee&#8217;s Organization argue instead that employers and employees should be able to negotiate in a productive dialogue, with mutual respect on both sides of the table, what the conditions and benefits of employment should be. An employment contract that has been agreed upon by both sides ensures fairness and transparency of process to all those involved and it guarantees enforceability of the conditions laid out in the contract as well. Without such a contract, employers like the University will continue to make often uninformed and arbitrary one-sided value judgments about what its graduate employees need to be able to support themselves and their families.<br />
© Copyright 2006 The Daily Illini<br />
<b>Unions rally for raises, benefits</b><br />
Kiran Sood<br />
Posted: 8/23/06<br />
Members of the Central Illinois Jobs with Justice chapter hosted a rally at the Alma Mater to discuss issues concerning University union workers Tuesday afternoon. Issues included living wages, decent health care coverage and employee benefits.<br />
The protest began at the Hallene Gateway, continued to the Main Library, the Swanlund Administration building and ended at the Alma Mater.<br />
Protestors marched through campus with signs reading, &#8220;We will strike for equity and fairness&#8221; and &#8220;I deserve a fair raise.&#8221;<br />
Gene Vanderport, member of the Illinois Education Association, said the intent is to give the University a message. He said important goals of the program include pension issues, retroactive pay and working together at the same time.<br />
&#8220;This morning, President White spoke about respect. He said that the most important thing for workers is respect,&#8221; said Chris Simeone, a negotiator present at the Rally for Local Workers and graduate student. &#8220;Being respected is a start. It is about respect when it comes to payday, well-being as employees and, most importantly, respect at the bargaining table.&#8221;<br />
Simeone said the workers are demanding decent health care and living wages.<br />
Phil Martini, a Union Representative and member of the Service Employees International Union, was an organizer of Tuesday&#8217;s rally. He said the negotiations currently under way with the University are not going well.<br />
Martini said the University is denying the union &#8220;retroactive pay, and refusing bargains in parking, and health care.&#8221;<br />
Germaine Light, member of the Illinois Education Association, said the people represented here are not just limited to the University, but include community members, churches, and politicians as well.<br />
&#8220;We are fighting for employees everywhere,&#8221; Light said. &#8220;We want good health care and pay for all employees.&#8221;<br />
Jobs with Justice is a national organization with a branch in Chicago, Light said, and their protests are not limited to the University. Light and other members of the organization were on hand at the opening of the new Hilton Garden Inn, 1501 S. Neil St., and have protested the non-union labor at Wal-Mart Supercenter, 2610 N. Prospect Ave., before.<br />
The University Unions United were sponsored by Central Illinois Jobs with Justice, a chapter of the National Jobs for Justice in central Illinois. The members of the Central Illinois Jobs with Justice present at the rally were the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31, The Illinois Education Association, the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization, the Service Employees International Union.<br />
Victor Osuna, chief negotiator of the Municipal Employees, said the unions have been in negotiations with the University for a year now. They have still not reached a contract agreement, he said.<br />
He said the reason the unions chose to march today was to make their presence known.<br />
&#8220;We are not going to be divided, and this is going to be an interesting process,&#8221; Asuna said.<br />
Robin Kaler, University&#8217;s associate chancellor for public affairs, said the school is working on the contracts, and she said that she recognizes the union&#8217;s rights to organize and protest.<br />
&#8220;We are doing everything we can to come up with a fair and equitable contract that is within the boundaries of what we can afford,&#8221; she said.<br />
Howard Berenbaum, member of the Union of Professional Employees and professor of psychology, said his goal is to negotiate in good faith with the University and support the unions. Carol Pruett, employee of Krannert Center for the Performing Arts and member of the International Association of Theatrical and Stage Employees, a labor union representing technicians, artisans and crafts persons in the entertainment industry, said there has been much difficulty reaching an agreement with the University. She said that she and her co-workers are among the lowest paid University employees.<br />
Pruett said there has been difficulty reaching an agreement and a federal negotiator has been called.<br />
Nancy Coddington, fellow Krannert employee, emphasized that the most important thing is a fair contract. She joined the protests when they began in late spring. She said the contract negotiations have not gone well, thus far.<br />
&#8220;We are fighting for fairness and pay,&#8221; Coddington said.<br />
© Copyright 2006 The Daily Illini</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uigeo.org/2006/12/15/in-the-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GEO and International Student Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.uigeo.org/2005/12/20/geo-and-international-student-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uigeo.org/2005/12/20/geo-and-international-student-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.uigeo.org/2005/12/20/geo-and-international-student-rights/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frequently Asked Questions
about International Students and the GEO
<p>Here are some frequently asked questions that pertain to international
students. You can find more answers to questions like these on our FAQ
page. If you still have questions about the GEO or rights, contact
the geo at geo@uigeo.org or call us
at 344-8283. We&#8217;d be happy to talk with you about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Frequently Asked Questions<br />
about International Students and the GEO</h3>
<p>Here are some frequently asked questions that pertain to international<br />
students. You can find more answers to questions like these on our <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000080.html">FAQ<br />
page</a>. If you still have questions about the GEO or rights, contact<br />
the geo at <a href="mailto:geo@uigeo.org">geo@uigeo.org</a> or call us<br />
at 344-8283. We&#8217;d be happy to talk with you about any concerns or questions<br />
you may have.</p>
<p><b>Q. Do I have the same Constitutional protections as<br />
domestic students?</b></p>
<p><b>A.</b> YES, international students<br />
have protection under the Constitution. This right has been repeatedly<br />
upheld in the U.S. Supreme Court:</p>
<ul>
<li>In Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1986), the Supreme<br />
Court held that the constitution, and in particular the 14th amendment,<br />
applied to all inhabitants of the U.S. who are &quot;either permanently<br />
or temporarily residing in the territory of the United States.&quot;</p>
<ul>
<li>14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in<br />
the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are<br />
citizens of the United States<br />
and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce<br />
any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens<br />
of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of<br />
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny<br />
to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the<br />
laws.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>In Bridges v. California, 314 U.S. 252 (1941), the<br />
Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment&#8217;s guarantees of free<br />
speech<br />
and association apply to internationals.</p>
<ul>
<li>1st Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting<br />
an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise<br />
thereof; or abridging the<br />
freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people<br />
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for<br />
a redress of grievances. </li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><b>Q. I&#8217;m an international student. If I join the Union,<br />
will the University retaliate against me? Will I be in danger of losing<br />
my assistantship or deportation?</b></p>
<p><b>A.</b> No. Every international graduate student, regardless<br />
of national origin or type of visa, has the right to join a union. Your<br />
right to belong to a union is protected by the right to freedom of association<br />
guaranteed in the United States Constitution. The United Nations Universal<br />
Declaration of Human Rights Article 20 also says that &quot;Everyone has<br />
the right to form and join trade unions for the protection of his (or<br />
her) interests.&quot; The University&#8217;s own <a href="http://www.admin.uiuc.edu/policy/code/article_1/a1_1-101.html" target="_blank">Statement<br />
on Individual Rights from the Code of Policies and Regulations Applying<br />
to All Students</a> states that students &quot;have at least the rights<br />
and responsibilities common to all citizens.&quot; This statement is<br />
not exclusionary of international students&#8211;it applies to all of us.<br />
The <a href="http://www.admin.uiuc.edu/policy/code/article_1/a1_1-108.html" target="_blank">University&#8217;s<br />
non-discrimination statement</a> also says that they cannot discriminate<br />
against someone because of their &quot;national origin.&quot;</p>
<p>That discrimination exists against international students,<br />
however, is clear. This is even more of a reason that international students<br />
should join the GEO and help fight for union recognition. Only with an<br />
union, independent of the University administration, can you be assured<br />
that if you are subject to discrimination by the administration that there<br />
is a group that will stand behind you and will help to defend you.</p>
<p>In fact, international graduate assistants have many reasons<br />
to join the Union and fight for representation:</p>
<ul>
<li>The union can provide a <b>voice and advocacy</b> for international<br />
graduate students who don&#8217;t always know the U.S. university system.</li>
<li>A union can help <b>ensure that departmental hiring practices are<br />
clear, open, and fair</b> so that international graduate students don&#8217;t<br />
miss out on work opportunities.</li>
<li>Since U.S. law prohibits international students from being paid for<br />
more than 20 hours per week, the need for a <b>minimum stipend that<br />
guarantees a decent living standard</b> is even more critical for them.</li>
<li><b>Better and more affordable benefits, a fair and enforceable grievance<br />
procedure, higher wages, a voice in our working conditions, and respect<br />
as employees</b> are things all assistants and their families deserve.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Links to other  web pages about GEO&#8217;s involvement in issues<br />
important to international students:</h3>
<p>4/2003: <a href="../news/pr/2003/030407drivers.html">Spouses of International Students Allowed to Obtain Driver&#8217;s<br />
Licenses, Briefly</a></p>
<p>9/2002: <a href="../news/organizer/2002/organizer0209.html#international">GEO Reacts To New Policy On International Grad Employee Pay</a></p>
<p>2/2001: <a href="../news/organizer/2001/organizer0102.html#international">International<br />
Grads Working for Justice</a></p>
<p>9/2000-12/2001: <a href="../resources/Intl_Grievance.html">International<br />
Graduate Assistants Docked Pay!</a></p>
<p>3/1999: <a href="../news/pr/1999/990324spousaltuition.html">University<br />
to End In-State Tuition Benefit for Spouses of Graduate Employees</a></p>
<p>11/1998: <a href="../news/organizer/1998/organizer9811.html#Orchard%20Downs">Orchard<br />
Downs Residents Call for Renovations to Ailing Grad Housing Units</a></p>
<p>2/1997: <a href="../news/organizer/1997/organizer9702.html#International">Fair<br />
and Just: International Grads Support Unionization</a></p>
<p>11/1997: <a href="../news/organizer/1997/organizer9711.html#Orchard">Orchard<br />
Downs: Keep It Affordable for Graduate Families</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uigeo.org/2005/12/20/geo-and-international-student-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Information on Fees and Waivers</title>
		<link>http://www.uigeo.org/2004/09/16/information-on-fees-and-waivers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uigeo.org/2004/09/16/information-on-fees-and-waivers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.uigeo.org/2004/09/16/information-on-fees-and-waivers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Many grads have been contacting the GEO office with concerns about their recent fee statements. This post is provided to help you understanding what&#8217;s going on with the recent issues related to grad employee pay, tuition waivers, health subsidies, family insurance premium increases, and hourly appointments.</p>
<p>
The format is a series of common questions we&#8217;ve heard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many grads have been contacting the GEO office with concerns about their recent fee statements. This post is provided to help you understanding what&#8217;s going on with the recent issues related to grad employee pay, tuition waivers, health subsidies, family insurance premium increases, and hourly appointments.</p>
<p><span id="more-147"></span><br />
The format is a series of common questions we&#8217;ve heard from grad employees and our response. If you have other questions or concerns beyond those raised here, contact your department steward or the GEO office (it is best to phone 344-8283 but you may also email geo@uigeo.org).<br />
Q: What&#8217;s going on with the GEO contract?<br />
A: In August, the GEO and the University of Illinois reached an agreement on the language of the contract. The contract provisions apply to graduate employees in the bargaining unit (most Teaching Assistants and Graduate Assistants); unfortunately, Research Assistants and Pre-Professional Graduate Assistants are not covered although they receive the pay raise and the insurance premium discount.<br />
Moreover, the GEO is there to assist if you have problems with your job, working conditions, or paychecks. The contract also entitles you to many rights. For example, if you are asked to discuss your job with your employer, you are entitled to have a union representative attend as well to observe and, if necessary, protect your rights under the contract.<br />
Q: Health fees: should I pay or not?<br />
A: The University has informed the GEO that graduate employees do not need to pay the $178 McKinley Fee listed on billing statements. Additionally graduate employees will only have to pay $183 toward the semester health insurance premium (this is the result of the University&#8217;s $50 contribution to the premium cost). Therefore, if you are going to pay your fees this week, you may subtract $228 ($178 + $50) from the total amount IF these waivers have not already been applied.<br />
If you have already paid your fees, the University has informed us that your account will be credited the amount of the overpayment. Additionally, the University has informed us that graduate employees should contact student accounts (studentaccounts@uiuc.edu) if they are assesed any unnecessary late fees.<br />
Some employee accounts have already been updated online. Check your account at https://apps.uillinois.edu/selfservice/index.html for updates.<br />
Q: I&#8217;ve heard that the current problems with payroll are related to the GEO&#8217;s contract. Is this true?<br />
A: Absolutely not. Unfortunately, some employees at Student Accounts and Financial Aid have been blaming the current problems on the GEO. The real blame goes to the ill-designed new payroll software known as BANNER. BANNER-related problems, including charging tuition, McKinley clinic fees, or missing paychecks, are not connected to the contract. You do not have to pay any erroneous fees or late penalties related to those mistakes. The University has promised that these problems will be cleared up in time for the October pay statement. The University has asked that you email studentaccounts@uiuc.edu if you have been assessed false late fees.<br />
Q: Because of payroll problems, I&#8217;m not getting the money I need. What do I do?<br />
A: If you don&#8217;t receive your paycheck or a financial aid refund because of<br />
a problem with BANNER, you are entitled to an emergency loan from financial aid, to a maximum of $1,000. While there is a $3 charge to process the loan, the University has told us that this will be taken off of your account if you contact Joe Creek in Student Accounts (3-5713 or jdcreek@uiuc.edu)<br />
Q: I have a grad hourly appointment and recently received notice that my employment pushed my appointment level over 67%. Should I quit that job to save my tuition waiver? A: According to the University administration, for the purposes of tuition waivers, hourly appointments do not count towards the overall appointment percentage. If you have been told otherwise, contact your GEO steward or your department office. However, international students should keep in mind that federal regulations do still count hourly appointments towards your total hours worked! Contact the Office of International Student Affairs if you have any questions.<br />
Q: I have dependent insurance coverage, and my rates just shot up. Is this because of the reductions to grad insurance premiums in the contract?<br />
A: No. Dependent coverage increased by 15% this semester because Mega Life, the insurance carrier, started charging more. Unfortunately, this increase was then passed on to grads.<br />
Q: I thought that the GEO had voted to charge dues and a fair share fee, but my pay statement shows no deduction / or only a $3 charge. What&#8217;s up?<br />
A: The services that the GEO provides to members and non-members in the bargaining unit, including bargaining a contract, servicing grievances, and conducting outreach, require financial support from grad employees. Therefore, the GEO assesses a small amount (dues for members, representation fee for non members) to cover the cost of these services. At the last General Membership Meeting, GEO members voted to set dues at 2%. However, because of payroll problems related to BANNER, the University did not charge the fee in time for the Sept 16 paydate. At recent negotiations, the GEO and the University agreed to implement the dues/representation fee in October.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uigeo.org/2004/09/16/information-on-fees-and-waivers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAQ</title>
		<link>http://www.uigeo.org/2004/08/12/faq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uigeo.org/2004/08/12/faq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.uigeo.org/2004/08/12/faq/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>General Questions about GEO</p>

What is the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization, and what are its goals? 
Why should I join the GEO?
Who is allowed to be a member of the union?
Are there other universities with graduate employee unions?

<p>Contract Questions</p>

Did we already have the protections stipulated in the contract? 
What do I do if the contract has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>General Questions</b><b></b> about GEO</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#Goals"><i>What is the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization, and what are its goals?</i></a> </li>
<li><a href="#official"><i>Why should I join the GEO?</i></a></li>
<li><i><a href="#member">Who is allowed to be a member of the union?</a></i></li>
<li><a href="#other"><i>Are there other universities with graduate employee unions?</i></a></li>
</ul>
<p><b>Contract Questions</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#Flexibility"><i>Did we already have the protections stipulated in the contract?</i></a> </li>
<li><i><a href="#Grievances">What do I do if the contract has been violated?</a></i></li>
</ul>
<p><b>Unionization and Its Effect on Assistantships and Duties</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#International"><i>I&#8217;m an international student. If I join the Union, will the University retaliate against me? Will I be in danger of losing my assistantship or deportation?</i></a></li>
<li><a href="#Strikes"><i>If I join the Union will I be forced to go on strike?</i></a> </li>
<li><a href="#budgets"><i>Won&#8217;t a graduate employee union just cost the University more money and lead to a decrease in the number of assistantships?</i></a></li>
<li><a href="#Collegiality"><i>I&#8217;ve got a good relationship with my advisor and the professor I work under for my assistantship. Will a union damage that relationship and simply be an unnecessary, intrusive third party?</i></a></li>
</ul>
<p><b>Effect of Unionization on Pay</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#Sciences"><i>I work in the sciences and I am well-paid already. Will the GEO try to raise the stipends of poorly-paid employees by cutting or freezing the pay of well-paid employees?</i></a></li>
</ul>
<p><b>Dues and Fair Share</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#Dues"><i>What are dues?</i></a> </li>
<li><a href="#spending"><i>How will the GEO spend members&#8217; dues money?</i></a> </li>
<li><a href="#duesspent"><i>Will the cost of union dues wipe out any increases in pay and benefits we may get?</i></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><b>GEO&#8217;s Affiliation With the Illinois and American Federation of Teachers and the AFL-CIO</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#Affiliates"><i>The GEO may be okay, but why is it affiliated with national labor unions? What do they know about graduate employees?</i></a> </li>
<li><a href="#AFT"><i>Does the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) control the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization?</i></a></li>
</ul>
<hr />
<p><span id="more-135"></span><br />
<a name="Goals" id="Goals"></a></p>
<h3><b>General Questions About the GEO</b></h3>
<p><b><i>Question.</i></b><i> What is the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization, and what are its goals?</i><br />
<b>Answer.</b> The GEO is a democratic member-run union for all graduate employees. Furthermore, the GEO is the official venue through which TAs and GAs can negotiate with the University administration over our healthcare, wages, and other working conditions.<br />
Over the last decade UIUC graduate employees, through the GEO, have pushed for and won better stipends, improvements in health insurance, and other benefits (for a more in depth history of the GEO, see <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/history/">A Brief History of the GEO</a>).<br />
GEO bargains with the university administration in good faith toward mutually agreeable improvements to employment policies and benefits for graduate employees, including a grievance policy for work conflicts, employer-paid health insurance, and smaller classes and paid training for TAs. But most importantly, we want a strong voice in making changes to employment policies and benefits. For more details see our <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mission/">Statement of Mission and Goals</a>.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<i><a name="official" id="official"></a></i><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<b><i>Q.</i></b><i> Why should I join the GEO?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> There is strength in numbers. Through a strong and active membership the GEO has made significant improvements in graduate employee working conditions. The most significant improvements include increased stipends, dental insurance, vision care, a full subsidy of the McKinley Fee, a partial subsidy of student insurance, and strong protections against overwork, discrimination, and arbitrary discipline (see the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/contract/">contract summary</a> for more info). Continued demonstration of unity will help enforce the contract we have now and help win improvements in heathcare and working conditions in the future. Furthermore members, and only members, run the GEO. Becoming a member empowers you to have a voice in your union and your working conditions.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<i><a name="member" id="member"></a></i><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<b><i>Q.</i></b><i> Who is allowed to be a member of the union?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> All graduate students are encouraged to become members of the GEO. As an organization, the GEO is committed to representing the interests of all graduate students with assistantships. In 2002, GEO won collective bargaining rights for most Teaching and Graduate Assistants through direct actions. Unfortunately the University remains steadfast in denying RAs and PGAs the same rights that TAs and GAs now take for granted. All members in good standing of the GEO may vote regardless of current employment status. RAs and PGAs are encouraged to join so that GEO can more effectively ensure that the economic benefits won through the contract are extended to all graduate employees.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="other" id="other"></a><br />
<b><i>Q.</i></b><i> Are there other universities with graduate employee unions?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> Yes. There are over 30 campuses with unions bargaining contracts for graduate student employees, including the Universities of Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Kansas, California, Oregon, Massachusetts, SUNY, and others. Graduate employee unions have been around since the 1970s. (For links to other graduate employee unions, see our <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/links/">Links page</a> or see the <a href="http://www.cgeu.org/">Coalition of Graduate Employee Unions</a> web site.) You can find out more information on what some of these other graduate employee unions have won by visiting our <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2005/12/20/graduate-employee-union-contracts/">Contract Comparison</a> page.)<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="Flexibility" id="Flexibility"></a></p>
<h3><b>Contract Questions</b></h3>
<p><i><b><i>Q.</i></b><i> </i>Did we already have the protections that are stipulated in the contract?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> No. Many of the procedures and protections resemble current university policy or practice while some protections are new. A recurring problem prior to the contract was that policies were only enforced when it was convenient for the administration to do so. The contract is legally binding and has a built-in procedure to enforce the contract that ends in third-party binding arbitration. This means that a body other than the University administration decides whether the contract has been violated.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="Grievances" id="Grievances"></a><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<i><b><i>Q.</i></b><i> </i>What do I do if the contract has been violated?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> Contact the GEO immediately! The contract incorporates both informal and more formal methods of filing grievances and also let the individual grievant decide which method is most appropriate for his or her particular grievance. GEO has a lot of experience helping individual graduate employees with grievances. Also, see our <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/grievance-help/"> Grievance Help</a> page.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="International" id="International"></a><br />
&nbsp;</p>
<h3><b>Unionization and Its Effect on Assistantships and Duties</b></h3>
<p><b><i>Q.</i></b><i> I&#8217;m an international student. If I join the union, will the university retaliate against me? Will I be in danger of losing my assistantship or deportation?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> No. Every international graduate student, regardless of national origin or type of visa, has the right to join a union. Your right to belong to a union is protected by the right to freedom of association guaranteed in the United States Constitution. The University&#8217;s own <a href=" http://www.admin.uiuc.edu/policy/code/article_1/a1_1-101.html">Preamble to the Students Rights section of the Code of Policies and Regulations Applying to All Students</a> states that students &quot;have at least the rights and responsibilities common to all citizens.&quot; This statement is not exclusionary of international students &#8212; it applies to all of us. The <a href=" http://www.admin.uiuc.edu/policy/code/article_1/a1_1-108.html">University&#8217;s non-discrimination statement</a> also says that they cannot discriminate against someone because of their &quot;national origin.&quot;<br />
That discrimination exists against international students, however, is clear. This is even more of a reason that international students should join the GEO and help fight for more protections. Only with a union, independent of the University administration, can you be assured that if you are subject to discrimination by the administration that there is a group that will stand behind you and will help to defend you.<br />
In fact, international graduate assistants have many reasons to join the union. First, the union can provide a voice and advocacy for international graduate students who don&#8217;t always know the U.S. university system. Second, the union can help ensure that departmental hiring practices are clear, open, and fair so that international graduate students don&#8217;t miss out on work opportunities. Third, since U.S. law prohibits international students from being paid for more than 20 hours per week, the need for a insuring that the minimum stipend guarantees a decent living standard is even more critical for them. Fourth, better and more affordable benefits, a fair and enforceable grievance procedure, higher wages, a voice in our working conditions, and respect as employees are things all assistants and their families deserve.<br />
(For more information on your rights as an international graduate employee, call the GEO office at 344-8283, write us at <a href="mailto:geo@uigeo.org">geo@uigeo.org</a>, and check out our web page on the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2005/12/20/geo-and-international-student-rights/">GEO and International Student Rights</a>.)<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="Strikes" id="Strikes"></a><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<b><i>Q.</i></b><i> If I join the Union will I be forced to go on strike?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> No. <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/#Strikes">A work action</a> can only be authorized by a vote of the union&#8217;s membership. A strike can only work if people support it of their own accord. The GEO&#8217;s Constitution ensures a member&#8217;s right to dissent through protections of the freedom of speech, protections against discrimination on the basis of political beliefs, and guarantees against limitations on an employee&#8217;s right to choose the time and manner of his or her work. Nowhere in the Constitution is the union&#8217;s leadership authorized to fine or discipline members for non-participation in a strike or for any other reason.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="budgets" id="budgets"></a><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<b><i>Q.</i></b><i> Doesn&#8217;t a graduate employee union just cost the University more money and lead to a decrease in the number of assistantships?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> Not necessarily. The data from UIUC shows that there is little correlation between providing good pay and benefits to grads and decreasing the number of assistantships. In 2002, prior to grads winning the bulk of the economic benefits, the University of Illinois greatly reduced the number of TAships available. The evidence from unionized campuses like the Universities of Wisconsin and Michigan shows that fair pay and benefits do not result in a decline in the number of assistantships. University of Wisconsin graduate employees bargained union contracts between 1970 and 1979, but the UW administration refused to bargain from 1979 to 1987. UW Teaching Assistants and Project Assistants won union rights again in 1987 and have bargained regular contracts since 1988. Since 1988 the number of assistantships at the UW has actually gone up at the from 2,373 to 2,839. At University of Michigan TAs and Staff Assistants won their first contract in 1975 when there were 1,200 employees. In 2000 there were 1,650 assistants.<br />
Budgets for assistantships are not fixed. They are dependent on undergraduate enrollment (demand for teachers) and graduate enrollment (supply of teachers). Budgets at state universities are also very political. We can have a greater impact on the political process if we are organized than if we have to rely on the good will of the legislature.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="Collegiality" id="Collegiality"></a><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<b><i>Q.</i></b><i> I&#8217;ve got a good relationship with my advisor and the professor I work under for my assistantship. Will a union damage that relationship and simply be an unnecessary, intrusive third party?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> No. There are over 30 campuses in the United States and Canada where graduate employees have chosen to unionize and there is no evidence that collective bargaining has damaged relationships between graduate employees and their advisors. In fact, a survey by Gordon Hewitt (a researcher at Tufts University) found that graduate student unions tend to create a positive environment on campus. Hewitt surveyed almost 300 faculty members in the liberal arts and sciences at universities with recognized graduate employee unions including the University of Massachusetts, SUNY Buffalo, the University of Florida, the University of Michigan and the University of Oregon. A faculty member at one of the universities said, &quot;The graduate student union [on] our campus has had a positive impact on the working and, in turn, studying and research lives of our grad students. For our department, the contracts negotiated to date have helped regularize hiring, working and disciplinary procedures in positive ways.&quot; Graduate student unions don&#8217;t get in the way of good relationships between faculty and students because that&#8217;s not what their membership wants. The union&#8217;s purpose is to intervene when abuses occur. For a more information on this issue, read the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2006/01/02/study-shows-grad-unions-improve-collegiality/">article concerning Hewitt&#8217;s study</a> in the January 2000 edition of &quot;The Organizer.&quot;<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="ss" id="ss"></a></p>
<h3>Effect of Unionization on Pay</h3>
<p><a name="Sciences" id="Sciences"></a><br />
<i>Q.</i><i> I work in the sciences and I am well-paid already. Will the GEO try to raise the stipends of poorly-paid employees by cutting or freezing the pay of well-paid employees?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> No. The contract only stipulates minimum raises and stipends.The union is about &#8220;leveling up,&#8221; not down, and has stated on many occasions that, as a matter of principle, it will not seek to freeze or cut anyone&#8217;s pay to fund pay increases for others. In fact, the GEO constitution <a href=" http://www.uigeo.org/faq/#Contracts">prohibits bargaining for pay caps or limits to employees&#8217; rights to choose the time and manner of their work</a>.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="Dues" id="Dues"></a><br />
&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Dues and Fair Share</h3>
<p><b><i>Q.</i></b><i> What are the dues?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> Every graduate employee covered by the contract is required to pay a &quot;fair share fee&quot; or &quot;representation fee&quot; (2% of the paycheck) to the union. Graduate employees who join the GEO pay the same amount. While membership is optional, the dues are mandatory. Under state law a union is required to represent everyone in the bargaining unit in contract negotiations and disputes. Therefore everyone who benefits from the union is required to fund the services. Membership dues for individuals outside the bargaining unit are currently set at a flat $3 per month.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="DuesSpent" id="DuesSpent"></a><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<i><b><i>Q.</i></b><i> </i>How will dues be spent?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> Running and effective union requires many expenses including staff, office space, computers, office equipment, mailings, supplies, etc. Also, as an affiliate of the <a href="http://www.aft.org">American Federation of Teachers</a> we pool money together with other locals to pay for legal support, legislative campaigns, trainings for members, and advisors to help us bargain and deal with <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/grievance-help/"> grievances</a>. Elected officers allocate the GEO&#8217;s local budget, and GEO has delegates who help determine how pooled resources are spent. With a financially healthy union we can enforce the contract and gain strength for the next contract fight. For more information, see a summary of the current <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/mt-archive/000213.html"> GEO Budget</a>.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="negate" id="negate"></a><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<b><i>Q.</i></b><i> Will the cost of union dues wipe out any increases in pay and benefits we may get?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> No. Dues have been set in such a way that everyone covered by the contract has benefits that far outweigh dues. For example, a TA in Chemistry with a 50% appointment would pay around $35/month in dues. However, that employee would take home and additional $122/month in 2005-6 due to the contract! This is even more impressive when you factor in past victories (such as fully subsidized vision and dental) and non-economic benefits and protections grads now enjoy.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="Affiliates" id="Affiliates"></a><br />
&nbsp;</p>
<h3><b>GEO&#8217;s Affiliation With the Illinois and American Federation of Teachers and the AFL-CIO</b></h3>
<p><b><i>Q.</i></b><i> The GEO may be okay, but why is it affiliated with national labor unions? What do they know about graduate employees?</i><br />
<b>A.</b> As professionals working in higher education, graduate employees share much with the other members of our state and national affiliates. The GEO is affiliated with the <a href="http://www.aft.org" target="_blank">American Federation of Teachers</a> (AFT), a 1,000,000-member organization that represents graduate employees at the Universities of Wisconsin (<a href="http://www.taa-madison.org/" target="_blank">Madison</a> and <a href="http://www.mgaa.org/" target="_blank">Milwaukee</a>), <a href="http://www.umgeo.org" target="_blank">Michigan</a>, <a href=" http://www.kugtac.org/" target="_blank">Kansas</a>, <a href="http://www.ufgau.org" target="_blank">Florida</a>, <a href=" http://cyber.acomp.usf.edu/~gau/" target="_blank">South Florida</a> and <a href="http://www.gtff.net/" target="_blank">Oregon</a>, <a href="http://www.tugsa.org" target="_blank">Temple</a>, <a href=" http://geocwsu.org/" target="_blank">Wayne State</a>, <a href=" http://www.geuatmsu.org/" target="_blank">Michigan State</a>, the <a href="http://www.psc-cuny.org/" target="_blank">City University of New York</a>, <a href="http://www.peak.org/%7Ecge/" target="_blank">Oregon State</a>, <a href=" http://www.unitedfacultyofflorida.org/" target="_blank">Florida A&amp;M</a>, as well as college professors, K-12 teachers and other public employees. Our state affiliate, the <a href="http://www.ift-aft.org" target="_blank">Illinois Federation of Teachers</a> (IFT), with over 85,000 members, represents professors at Eastern, Western, and Northern Illinois Universities as well as professors at many community colleges in the state, K-12 teachers and other public employees. Within the AFT we are part of the <a href=" http://www.aft.org/higher_ed/grademp/about.htm" target="_blank">Alliance of Graduate Employee Locals</a> (AGEL) that helps to coordinate policy for the AFT. The GEO is a very large local within the IFT and sends delegates to the IFT and AFT conventions, which set policy and oversee budgets at the state and national level. Through our affiliation with the national AFL-CIO we are part of a network of unions across the country that are fighting for workplace and economic justice just as we are. The AFL-CIO provides valuable resources and knowledge that benefits us in our drive for recognition and that will help us as we move into negotiations with the administration. Besides providing solidarity in our struggle, they also lobby in Washington DC on behalf of working people and for policies that enhance our rights as employees.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a><br />
<a name="AFT" id="AFT"></a><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<i><b><i>Q.</i></b><i> </i><i>Does the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) control the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization?</i></i><br />
<b>A.</b> The Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization (GEO) was formed in 1988 by Teaching, Research, and Graduate Assistants on this campus with an eye to improve their own salaries, health care, and workload. In 1995, after much research and discussion, the GEO membership voted to affiliate with the <a href="http://www.ift-aft.org" target="_blank">Illinois Federation of Teachers</a> (IFT) and its parent union the <a href="http://www.aft.org" target="_blank">American Federation of Teachers</a> (AFT). The AFT has proven experience with higher education: it represents graduate employees at the universities of Wisconsin, Michigan, Kansas, Oregon, and Temple, as well as college professors across the country. On these campuses graduate employees run their own unions by electing their own officers, filing their own grievances, and <a href=" http://www.uigeo.org/faq/#Contracts">bargaining their own contracts</a>. The most important factor in choosing to affiliate with the AFT was that they offered us a network of support and resources without threatening the autonomy of our union as a democratic organization, which has always and will always be run by us and for us &#8212; its graduate employee members. This full organizational autonomy is guaranteed by our <a href=" http://www.uigeo.org/constitution/">constitution</a>. In short, the &#8220;outside&#8221; voices the administration fears are really the &#8220;inside&#8221; voices of graduate employees in a strong, democratic union.<br />
Back to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/faq/">Top</a> <b>|</b> Return to the <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/2004/11/10/join-geo/">Join GEO!</a> <b>|</b> <a href="http://www.uigeo.org/">GEO Mainpage</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uigeo.org/2004/08/12/faq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.uigeo.org/2004/08/12/constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uigeo.org/2004/08/12/constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.uigeo.org/2004/08/12/constitution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>PREAMBLE
We, the members of the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization (GEO), are committed to the principles of participatory democracy. Thus, as graduate employees at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (&#8220;the University&#8221;), we claim the right to participate in making decisions that affect our lives. This can only mean our bona fide representation in University governance. Formal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PREAMBLE<br />
We, the members of the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization (GEO), are committed to the principles of participatory democracy. Thus, as graduate employees at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (&#8220;the University&#8221;), we claim the right to participate in making decisions that affect our lives. This can only mean our bona fide representation in University governance. Formal recognition of the work of graduate employees generates due respect for our work and, moreover, ensures better working conditions for all of us. This can only enable the University in successfully fulfilling its mission, namely, to provide quality higher education. We envisage a working and learning environment at this University that is democratic, inclusive, non-discriminatory, and above all, just. We shall do everything in our power to materialize this vision.<br />
In keeping with these basic principles, we give to ourselves and to future graduate employees this Constitution.</p>
<p><span id="more-134"></span><br />
Article I:  Name</p>
<ol type=A>
<li>The name of this organization shall be the Graduate Employees&#8217; Organization, or in short GEO (&#8220;the union&#8221;).</li>
</ol>
<p>
Article II:  Objectives of the GEO</p>
<ol type=A>
<li>Organizing: To empower graduate employees on the job and within the wider University community.</li>
<li>Collective Representation and Bargaining: To act as the representative for graduate employees in negotiations with the University administration and any other relevant body over terms and conditions of employment.</li>
<li>Education: To promote quality instruction and research at the University.</li>
<li>Community: To foster a sense of community among graduate employees from all departments and backgrounds.</li>
<li>Cooperation and Social Justice: To cooperate with other working people on campus and beyond in order to promote social justice.</li>
</ol>
<p>Article III:  Membership </p>
<ol type=A>
<li>Any person employed by the University in a bargaining unit for which the union is the recognized bargaining agent is eligible to be a member of the union. Any person formerly employed in such a bargaining unit and expecting re-employment within one year is eligible for membership.</li>
<li>All graduate students at the University are eligible for membership in the union.</li>
<li>All officers, duly elected, shall be eligible for membership, for the academic year in which they hold office, by virtue of their election.</li>
<li>Members shall remain in good standing by paying regular dues to the union and by complying with directives of the union. The By-laws will specify dues. Officers must remain members in good standing of the GEO in order to retain their position.</li>
<li>No eligible person shall be denied membership. All members in good standing will have equal rights and privileges under this constitution.</li>
</ol>
<p>Article IV:  Organizational Structure </p>
<ol type=A>
<li>The GEO is a representative body, and its structure shall reflect the democratic values on which it is based. Members shall suffer no impairment of freedom of speech concerning the operations of the GEO. Active discussion of GEO affairs shall be encouraged and protected within the GEO.</li>
<li>The Coordinating Committee is the executive body of the union. Between meetings of the CC officers shall exercise such powers as are granted to them by this constitution or by the CC.</li>
<li>The Stewards Council shall exercise oversight of the Coordinating Committee, shall advise the CC, and may refer any action (or lack of action) or decision by the CC or an officer to a membership meeting.</li>
<li>Subject to this constitution, the bye-laws of the GEO, and other decisions approved by ballot as laid out in Article VI, membership meetings, as regulated by article V, shall be the supreme decision making body of the union.</li>
<li>Members shall have the right to full participation in the decision-making process, through discussion and voting, and shall receive due notice of membership meetings and have access to any information necessary for the exercise of this right.</li>
<li>The enumeration in this constitution of certain roles or powers for a body or officer shall not prevent that body or officer from holding other roles or powers not so enumerated.</li>
</ol>
<p>Article V:  Membership Meetings</p>
<ol type=A>
<li>Regular membership meetings shall be held at least once during each of the fall and spring academic semesters.</li>
<li>Membership meetings shall be run in accordance with such rules of procedure (&#8217;standing orders&#8217;) as may be specified in the union bye-laws from time to time.</li>
<li>Any member may have any matter placed on the agenda either before the meeting or, by making a motion (subject to a vote), at the meeting, as regulated by standing orders, except where restricted by this constitution or by law. At any meeting, members shall have the right to make a motion on any topic being considered by the meeting.</li>
</ol>
<p>Article VI:  Ballots, elections, and referenda </p>
<ol type=A>
<li>Officer elections, and votes on contracts or to authorize industrial action shall be by secret ballot, and shall be called by the Coordinating Committee. Membership may also vote to have any issue put to such a ballot by a two-thirds majority of those present and voting at a membership meeting.</li>
<li>Ballots shall be free, fair, and democratic, and shall be operated by the elections committee. The election committee, in setting procedure, shall adhere to any directions from the Stewards Council, and to the following provisions:
<ol type=1>
<li>Written notice of officer elections will be mailed to all members at their home addresses no less than 15 days before that election.</li>
<li>The GEO will comply with all reasonable requests of any election candidate to distribute by mail or otherwise, at the candidate&#8217;s expense, campaign literature in aid of such person&#8217;s candidacy to all members in good standing.</li>
<li>The GEO will not promote the candidacy of any particular candidate in an election </li>
<li>Each member in good standing shall be entitled to an equal number of votes.</li>
<li>Provision will be made for candidates to have observers at the polling place and the counting of ballots.</li>
<li>Voting will take place for at least eight hours on each of two consecutive days.</li>
<li>Ballots and all other records pertaining to officer elections shall be preserved for one year.</li>
<li>The conduct of elections shall be consistent with all relevant laws, including, in particular, the standards for such elections developed under Title IV of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA).</li>
<li>The by-laws will specify the voting system to be used.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>An election to fill a vacant officership must be held within 25 days of the vacancy arising.</li>
<li>All elected officials of the GEO may be recalled, subject to the conditions and procedures listed below. 
<ol type=1>
<li>Any member in good standing may circulate a petition requesting recall of a particular officer. Anyone desiring to recall more than one officer must circulate a petition for each officer s/he seeks to recall. </li>
<li>A petition that has received official endorsement from at least 10% of all members in good standing may then be submitted directly to any member of the Coordinating Committee or to one of the Stewards&#8217; Chairs. </li>
<li>All action pertaining to a petition to recall and all action regarding sustaining recall shall be conducted at a special meeting of the membership called for that purpose. This meeting shall occur no more than two weeks after receipt of a petition to recall and membership shall receive due notice of the meeting.</li>
<li>Voting shall be in secret. Two-thirds of members present and voting are required to support the motion to recall in order for it to succeed.</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
<p>Article VII:  Officers </p>
<ol type=A>
<li>The officers of the GEO shall consist of two Co-Presidents, a Treasurer, a Communications Officer, a Grievance Officer and three Officers-at-Large.</li>
<li>Officers shall be elected by a vote of the membership during the Spring semester, and serve until the elections in the following Spring semester. No person shall hold the same office for more than two (2) consecutive terms.</li>
<li>All members shall be eligible to run for and hold office, except that regular employees of the GEO, the Illinois Federation of Teachers (IFT), or the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) may not become officers of the GEO. This section does not preclude the union from deciding to pay a stipend or wage to any officer. Any such wage must be approved by the membership at a membership meeting.</li>
</ol>
<p>Article VIII:  Officers&#8217; Duties </p>
<ol type=A>
<li>Co-Presidents </p>
<ol type=1>
<li>Co-Presidents shall preside over meetings of the Coordinating Committee.</li>
<li>Co-Presidents shall make periodic reports to the membership regarding the state of the GEO.</li>
<li>Co-Presidents shall act as or designate a member or members in good standing to act as liaisons with affiliated organizations or any other relevant body.</li>
<li>The co-Presidents shall nominate the chairpersons of Membership Meetings.</li>
<li>Co-Presidents shall meet regularly with staff to coordinate staff activities.</li>
<li>Co-Presidents may divide these duties as they see fit, but shall share responsibilities equally. </li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Treasurer 
<ol type=1>
<li>The Treasurer shall be responsible for the accounts of the GEO. She or he shall receive and receipt for all monies of the GEO. She or he shall prepare checks for the payment of all liabilities of the GEO that are for purposes authorized or required by this constitution or authorized by the membership and none other. She or he shall sign all checks so prepared.</li>
<li>Members shall have the right to a full and clear accounting of all GEO funds. Such accounting shall include, but not be limited to, periodic reports to the membership by the treasurer and </li>
<li>The Treasurer shall make regular reports to the Membership, and make the financial records of the GEO available for annual audit by officers selected for that purpose or by independent auditors not otherwise connected with the GEO. The membership shall have access to the financial records of the GEO in a manner specified by the by-laws. </li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
<p>Article IX:  Committees </p>
<ol type=A>
<li>The Coordinating Committee </p>
<ol type=1>
<li>The Coordinating Committee will consist of the Officers and up to three Stewards elected by the Stewards Council. </li>
<li>A quorum of six voting members is necessary to conduct business. </li>
<li>Coordinating Committee meetings will be open to the membership to attend on a non-voting basis. The Stewards Council shall be notified of the time and place of meetings and shall have the responsibility of communicating that information to interested members.</li>
<li>The Coordinating Committee shall carry on the day-to-day functions of the union as directed by the membership. </li>
<li>The Coordinating Committee shall make recommendations to the membership for consideration and action. </li>
<li>In the course of carrying out the directives of the membership, the Coordinating Committee may authorize expenditures for organizing materials, office equipment and supplies, and other items necessary for the operation of the union.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Stewards Council
<ol type=1>
<li>The Stewards Council will consist of those stewards appointed by departments as laid out in Article X.</li>
<li>The Stewards Council shall develop and promote organizing and educational programs for Stewards and the membership. </li>
<li>The Stewards Council shall elect two of its members as Co-Chairs who may, but need not be, among the stewards appointed to the Coordinating Committee. The Co-Chairs will be responsible for ensuring the smooth operation of the Stewards Council.</li>
<li>The Stewards Council shall meet at least 3 times in each of the fall and spring academic semesters. </li>
<li>The Stewards Council may write its own by-laws to govern its internal operations.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>The Communications Committee
<ol type=1>
<li>The Primary responsibility of the Communications Committee will be the instigation and maintenance of all external communications, i.e. with the press and with the public at large.</li>
<li>The Communications Committee will be chaired by the Communications Officer and its membership will include at least one Officer-at-Large. All other committee members will be drawn from the general membership by whatever means are deemed appropriate by the Coordinating Committee. </li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>The Personnel Committee 
<ol type=1>
<li>The Primary responsibility of the Personnel Committee is the hiring and firing of all Union staff. Hiring procedures shall in no way discriminate on the basis of race, creed, color, national origin, nationality, citizenship, religion, sex, age, sexual orientation, marital/parental status, native language or dialect, disability, international or local organization affiliation, or status as a veteran.</li>
<li>The Personnel Committee will also be responsible for establishing all terms of Union staff employment, including, but not limited to, wages and benefits.</li>
<li>The Coordinating Committee will convene the Personnel Committee as the need arises. Its membership will include three people elected by the Stewards Council, one member of the current staff &#8211; except when conflict of interest makes such inclusion inappropriate &#8211; and the two Co-Presidents who will serve as co-chairs of the committee.</li>
<li>In the event that the GEO staff chooses to unionize, the Personnel Committee, will act as the contract bargaining committee and will work with the staff to establish and renew employee contracts.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>The Grievance Committee
<ol type=1>
<li>The Primary responsibility of the Grievance Committee is the handling of grievances between the employer and employees in any bargaining unit represented by the union.</li>
<li>The Grievance Officer shall chair the Grievance Committee.</li>
<li>The other members shall be appointed by the Coordinating Committee, subject to approval by the Stewards Council. Terms of appointment shall be as determined by the Stewards Council.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Election Committee
<ol type=1>
<li>The Stewards Council shall appoint and convene, as and when necessary, an Election Committee to conduct elections and secret ballots. The Election Committee shall be responsible for publicizing elections, taking nominations, and overseeing voting and vote counting. Officers and candidates may not sit on the Election Committee in the case of Officer elections.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Strike committees
<ol type=1>
<li>Strike committees shall be appointed prior to any industrial action undertaken by the GEO.</li>
<li>The membership of a strike committee shall be declared in the motion approving the taking of such action, and shall include the members of the Coordinating Committee. Members of a strike committee are subject to recall in the same manner as an officer of the union.</li>
<li>Strike committees shall assume executive control of such aspects of union activity, including powers delegated by this constitution to the SC and CC, as are deemed necessary for the successful operation of the action. Such powers may be enumerated in the motion appointing the committee, or may be delegated by a later motion, or by a decision of the SC or CC as appropriate.</li>
<li>Members shall follow the directions of the strike committee in the operation of the strike.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Ad hoc committees may be appointed as the need arises, under such terms as the Coordinating Committee, Stewards Council or other appointing body shall determine, and the powers and duties of such body may be delegated to such committee, except where such delegation is prohibited by this constitution.</li>
</ol>
<p>Article X:  Stewards </p>
<ol type=A>
<li>Departments shall select Stewards who will coordinate organizing within departments, participate in union-wide organizing and education, and handle grievances of members within departments.</li>
<li>The Stewards Council may, from time to time, issue guidelines as to how stewards should be selected (including definition of departments and grouping as appropriate or useful) and governing departmental representation in the Stewards Council, including outlining procedures for removal of stewards where necessary. Such guidelines will be subject to approval and/or amendment at the general membership meeting following the adoption of the guidelines.</li>
<li>Guidelines for the selection of Stewards shall not infringe any Department&#8217;s right to exercise democratic control over the selection and removal, and method of selection and removal, of that Department&#8217;s Stewards.</li>
</ol>
<p><a name="Contracts" id="Contracts"></a><br />
Article XI:  Contracts </p>
<ol type=A>
<li>The union may enter into a contract or other agreement covering the terms and conditions of employment of its membership, or part of its membership. </li>
<li>At such times as the union decides to enter negotiations with the University regarding a potential contract or other agreement, the union will form a bargaining team to undertake such negotiations. Members of the bargaining team will be members in good standing, and shall include at least one of the Co-Presidents, two representatives chosen by the Stewards&#8217; Council, and one member-at-large chosen by the membership at a membership meeting. Other members may be appointed by the Coordinating Committee, subject to the approval of the Stewards Council, or be elected by the Stewards Council or the membership following a decision by that body. Additional members may be appointed by these various bodies from time to time.</li>
<li>Members of the bargaining team are subject to recall in the same manner as officers of the union. When a contract is successfully agreed and approved by the GEO membership the committee shall be dissolved.</li>
<li>Any contract or agreement negotiated by the bargaining team must be ratified by the membership in ballot as outlined in Article VI. Eligible voters shall be those members in good standing. A simple majority of votes cast by eligible members shall be required to ratify a contract or other agreement with the University.</li>
<li>The union may not negotiate, nor enter into a contract or agreement, with the University covering academic practices and policies as they relate to graduate employees in their capacity as students, salary maximums, or limitations on employees&#8217; rights to choose the time and manner of their work. </li>
</ol>
<p><a name="Strikes" id="Strikes"></a><br />
Article XII:  Work Action </p>
<ol type=A>
<li>A ballot of the membership, as outlined in Article VI, will be necessary to authorize work action.</li>
<li>Such motion will vest authority in the strike committee to initiate the action, and to suspend the work action pending a vote to end the action.</li>
<li>Work action may be ended by a simple majority of votes cast by eligible members at a meeting called for that purpose by the Strike Committee overseeing the action. Such meeting shall be called by the Strike Committee upon its own initiative or upon receipt of a petition signed by 10% of the members in good standing involved in the action. The Strike Committee need not consent to hold a meeting in response to such a petition within seven days of the start of the action, or within seven days of the last such meeting. The time and place of the meeting will be widely publicized to the membership.</li>
<li>Only members in good standing who hold current employment may vote on a motion to initiate or terminate work action.</li>
</ol>
<p>Article XIII:  Affiliation </p>
<ol type=A>
<li>The GEO shall be affiliated with the Illinois Federation of Teachers, the American Federation of Teachers, and the American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations.</li>
<li>The treasurer shall transmit necessary membership dues to all organizations with which the GEO is affiliated.</li>
</ol>
<p>Article XIV:  Amendment </p>
<ol type=A>
<li>Any member or members seeking to amend the constitution shall present in writing a copy of the proposed amendment to a member of the Coordinating Committee no less than 10 days prior to the meeting at which they wish the amendment to be considered. The Coordinating Committee shall immediately be notified of such proposed amendment and it shall be published and placed on the agenda for the membership meeting no less than 7 days before the meeting.</li>
<li>If a majority of members attending and voting at the membership meeting vote in favor of the proposed amendment it shall be put to a ballot as outlined in article VI. </li>
</ol>
<p>Article XV:  By-laws </p>
<ol type=A>
<li>The union may write by-laws to this constitution. </li>
<li>All changes to the by-laws must be voted on at a Membership Meeting. Proposed changes to the by-laws shall be placed on the agenda for the membership meeting no less than 7 days before the meeting.</li>
<li>A simple majority of those attending the Membership Meeting shall be necessary to amend the by-laws.</p>
</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uigeo.org/2004/08/12/constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
